ICS 2013 Scientific Podium Poster Session S27

Pelvic Organ Prolapse 2

Scientific Podium Poster Session S27

Speakers
	Friday 30th August 2013
	14:00 - 15:30
	115 Capacity: 350
B Brigitte Fatton ICS Chair C Con Kelleher ICS Chair

Session Schedule

14:30

#243 Prevalence and risk factors for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse using the ICIQ-Vaginal Symptoms questionnaire: results from the TwinsUK adult twin registry

Dutta S¹, Cartwright R², Tikkinen K³, Bray R¹, Khullar V¹, Spector T⁴, Jarvelin M²
1. Dept of Urogynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK, 2. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Imperial College London, UK, 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, 4. Department of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Questionnaire, Prolapse Symptoms, Female

14:35

#244 Patient characteristics and symptoms indicative of pelvic organ prolapse in older women with pelvic floor symptoms: a cross-sectional study in primary care

Wiegersma M¹, Panman C¹, Kollen B¹, Berger M¹, Lisman - Van Leeuwen Y¹, Dekker J¹
1. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of General Practice, Groningen, The Netherlands
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Prolapse Symptoms, Anal Incontinence

14:40

#245 The ‘bother’ of prolapse

Ulrich D¹, Trutnovsky G², Guzman Rojas R³, Kamisan Atan I³, Dietz H P³
1. Monash University Melbourne; Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, Australia, 2. Medical University Graz, Austria; Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, Australia, 3. Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, Australia
Imaging, Female, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Floor

14:45

#246 PREOPERATIVE REDUCTION COUGH STRESS TEST IN WOMEN WITH PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, WITH AND WITHOUT SYMPTOMS OF STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE

Espuña M¹, Fillol M², Martin A³, Pascual M A⁴, Aragon M⁵, Berdie C⁶, Escolano A⁷, Cazorla E⁸, Muñoz F⁹, Moral E¹⁰, Fernández I¹¹, Gispem G¹²
1. Hospital Clinic, 2. Hospital La Plana, 3. Hospital Materno Infantil de Canarias, 4. Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 5. Hospital Torrecardenas Almería, 6. Hospital Creo Roja Hospitalet, 7. Hospital Comarcal del Noroeste, 8. Hospital Torrevieja, 9. Hospital 12 de Octubre, 10. Hospital de Pontevedra, 11. Hospital de Navarra, 12. Grupo GISPEM
Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Surgery

14:50

#247 A Systematic review of catheterisation following pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery

Velusamy A¹, Wood M¹, Foon R²
1. Specialty trainee, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, UK, 2. Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, UK
Infection, Urinary Tract, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Voiding Dysfunction

14:55

#248 Defect- specific rectocele repair: medium- term subjective and objective outcomes

Guzman Rojas R¹, Shek K L¹, Kamisan Atan I¹, Dietz H P¹
1. University of Sydney
Anatomy, Bowel Evacuation Dysfunction, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgery

15:00

#249 One year follow-up after laparoscopic hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised study.

Rahmanou P¹, Price N¹, Jackson S¹
1. Department of Urogynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgery, Prospective Study

15:05

#250 A Six Year Retrospective Audit of Clinical and Subjective Outcomes of Surgical Vaginal Prolapse Repair with the Insertion of Mesh

Bhal N¹, Smith J², Thomas L², Chawathe S²
1. University Hospital of Wales, 2. Prince Charles Hospital
Female, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgery, Prolapse Symptoms, Quality of Life (QoL)

15:10

#251 Intra- and perioperative morbidity following pelvic organ prolapse repair using a transvaginal suture capturing mesh device compared to trocar guided transvaginal mesh and traditional colporraphy

Altman D¹, Møller Bek K², Mikkola T³, Gunnarsson J⁴, Ellström Engh M⁵, Falconer C⁶
1. Stockholm Urogynecological Clinic/ Karolinska Instituet, Sweden, 2. Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark, 3. Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 4. Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Göteborg, Sweden, 5. Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway., 6. Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Grafts: Synthetic, New Devices, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgery, Clinical Trial

15:15

#252 How stable is the mesh after implantation? Longitudinal prospective observational study

Svabik K¹, Martan A¹, Masata J¹, El Haddad R¹, Hubka P¹
1. Ob & Gyn Dept 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague
Grafts: Synthetic, Prospective Study, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgery

15:20

#253 Clinical application of the IUGA/ICS classification system for mesh-related complications

Posthuma R¹, Weinstein M M¹, Iyer S¹, Alperin M², Wakamatsu M M¹, Pulliam S J¹
1. Massachusetts General Hospital, 2. University of California, San Diego
Grafts: Synthetic, Surgery, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Terminology

15:25

#254 RECLASSIFICATION OF COMPLICATIONS IN SURGERY USING MESH TO REPAIR DEFECTS OF PELVIC FLOOR

Pérez Hernández C¹, Lleberia Juanos J¹, Pubill Soler J¹, Ruiz Murillo R¹, Mestre Costa M¹, Mutlló Cantarell S¹, Grimau Gallego M¹, Canet Estévez Y¹
1. Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Female, Surgery, Retrospective Study