Hypothesis / aims of study
The gold standard for evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in men is the Abrams-Griffiths number (AG) renamed the bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) [1] which is deduced from intubated flow (IF). During urodynamic study (free uroflow (FF) before cystometry and IF), it is frequently observed a reduced maximum flow rate (Qmax) during IF. Geometric obstructive effect of catheter is not sufficient to explain the phenomenon and mechanical properties of detrusor are unchanged. It has been demonstrated in women that that behavior may be the consequence of a urethral reflex [2]. The phenomenon was found widely dependant of the ratio Qmax.FF/Qmax.IF and a cut-off value of Qmax.FF>1.5*Qmax.IF had been chosen, sufficiently large, to be a significant difference. The consequence of such phenomenon was an overestimation of outflow obstruction.
Our hypothesis was that a similar phenomenon could occur in men. Recently, nomograms based on free uroflows (FF) have been carried out using the VBN mathematical model of micturition, to develop an amended AG (corr-AG) allowing to evaluate BOO when Qmax.FF > Qmax.IF; in that first study, the cut-off value for Qmax.FF/Qmax.IF was > 1.5 [3].
Is that cut-off value optimized? Our purpose was, for the first time, to evaluate the category migration in AG nomogram in a large male population suspected of BOO, performing a FF before an IF with Qmax.FF/Qmax.IF higher than 1.0.
Study design, materials and methods
Population comprised 441 files of men, aged >45 years, suspected of BOO; each file comprised a FF followed by an IF (urethral catheter 8F).
The VBN model was applied for computations allowing a link between data of FF and IF.
The geometric effect of urethral catheter during IF was taken into account.
BOO evaluation obtained from IF and AG was compared with corr-AG. Cut-off values for AG: non-obstructed NO (<20), equivocal E (≥20 and ≤40) and obstructed O (>40 cm H2O) were the same applied for corr-AG.
Cut-off values for Qmax.FF/Qmax.IF were tested with increment of 0.1 in the range 1.0 to 1.5.
Interpretation of results
The role of urethral catheter during IF has been widely documented but possibility of inducing a urethral reflex has been less studied [2]. Occurrence of such a reflex can induce a decrease in Qmax and thus an overestimation of BOO. This last phenomenon may be investigated using data of FF. A corr-AG is computed from data of FF (measured Qmax and a computed pdet.Qmax.FF) performed before IF [3]. Our purpose was to optimize the cut-off value of the ratio Qmax.FF/Qmax.IF from which it will have to be considered.
From the results of this study, it appears that a ratio ≤ 1.2 is without significance, from 1.2 to 1.5 FF must be repeated far from IF, and for a ratio higher than 1.5, BOO using usual classification is likely (21.9%) to be overestimated. Note that the migration from equivocal to non-obstructed is not negligible since the intermediate values of the ratio.