Study design, materials and methods
MATERIAL & METHODS: Between June 2003 to June 2012, 97 female patients with SUI
were randomly distributed to two groups ; group I (TVT) included 49 patients and group II (TOT ) included 48 patients . All patients underwent preoperative evaluation including case history, physical examination (general,urological,neurological and urogynecological ) and urine stress test, urine analysis and culture to exclude UTI, and urodynamic tests including water cystometry, stress urethral pressure profile test and abdominal leak point pressure.
The operative data such as operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay and any perioperative complications were recorded. All patients were evaluated at 3 months , 6 months and yearly .
At each follow up visit, the patients were examined for complications ,voiding and storage
symptoms (by standard questionnaire ),the state of continence , urodynamics . An Arabic version of the SEAPI -QMM quality of life index was used to assess the outcome in the two groups.The criteria of cure of SUI were a negative stress test , a negative 24-h pad test and no other treatment for SUI .
Interpretation of results
The mean of objective SEAPI score showed a significant improvement in both groups and this was maintained for the five years in TVT group but in TOT group it marginally increased after one year later.