Implementation of Best Practices for Training in Focus Group Methodology in a Multi-Site Study: A novel curriculum from the Prevention of Lower Urinary Track Symptoms Consortium (PLUS) Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities and Experiences (SHARE).

Hebert-Beirne J1, Nodora J2, Hardacker C3, Burgio K4, Camenga D5, James A6, Newman D K7, Rudser K8, Schmitz K7, Kane Low L9

Research Type

Pure and Applied Science / Translational

Abstract Category

Research Methods / Techniques

Abstract 756
Non Discussion Abstracts
Scientific Non Discussion Abstract Session 36
Quality of Life (QoL) Female Incontinence Pelvic Floor Terminology
1. University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, 2. University of California-San Diego, 3. Howard Brown Health, 4. University of Alabama at Birmingham, 5. Yale University, 6. Washington University, 7. University of Pennsylvania, 8. University of Minnesota, 9. Michigan University
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Although the quality and rigor of qualitative research relies on the skills of the individuals who serve as the instruments of data collection, few guidelines exist in academic literature describing best practices of qualitative research training. Training is needed that is comprehensive and standardized to ensure scientific rigor, yet flexible to leverage the assets and expertise moderators bring to the research process. We describe our systematic approach to training a cohort of 15 focus group (FG) moderators for the National Institutes of Health Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium’s Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities and Experiences.
Study design, materials and methods
The FGs were designed to explore women and girls’ experiences, perceptions, knowledge, and behaviors related to bladder health across the life course.  A strategic training approach was taken to orient and train moderators from seven research centers with significant geographic and disciplinary differences. Drawing on best practices in adult education and action learning, a 3-stage curriculum was designed to leverage moderator proficiency and PLUS transdisciplinary expertise.
Results
The first stage involved online interactive web-based education, using instructional videos, discussion forums, and assessment tools. The second stage was an in-person didactic and experiential component including mock FGs to build moderator engagement and skill. The third phase involved supplemental online training to troubleshoot emergent issues and refresh skills throughout data collection.
Interpretation of results
Multi-level evaluative feedback mechanisms addressed instructional gaps and identified additional training needs. Analysis of training implementation data is ongoing.
Concluding message
This training approach may be used by qualitative researchers to strengthen their research credibility and trustworthiness.
Disclosures
Funding The Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through cooperative agreements (grants DK106786, DK106853, DK106858, DK106898, DK106893, DK106827, DK106908, DK106892). Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee University of Pennsylvania SMART IRB Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
18/04/2024 06:16:40