1.Differences in BBF caused by androgen changes
The mean BBF rates for the experimental rats were 1.47 ± 0.23, 1.22 ± 0.46, 1.23 ± 0.41, and 1.00 ± 0.36 (mL/min/g) for the A, B, C, and D groups, respectively. Compared to Group A, the mean BBF were significantly decreased in Group D (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1).
2.Relationship between androgen changes and bladder function
No significant difference was noted in the maximum voiding pressure between NS irrigation and AA irrigation among the A, B,C and D groups (39.9 ± 8.1 to 37.5 ± 4.6, 40.5 ± 4.4 to 42.6 ± 5.6, 36.0 ± 7.2 to 42.0 ± 3.4, and 33.9 ± 5.5 to 39.8 ± 3.5 [cmH2O], respectively).
The voiding intervals in each group were shortened (P < 0.001) following AA irrigation (482.7 ± 69.2 to 201.4 ± 78.4, 596.5 ± 79.7 to 270.9 ± 58.7, 594.0 ± 60.2 to 283.6 ± 163.2, and 373.0 ± 80.8 to 180.0 ± 37.0 [sec]. Further, compared to Group A, the voiding intervals were significantly shorter in Group B and C (p < 0.001), and compared to Group B and C, the voiding intervals were significantly shorter in Group D following NS irrigation (p < 0.001), and compared to Group A, the voiding intervals were significantly shorter in Group B (p < 0.001), compared to Group B, the voiding intervals were significantly shorter in Group C (p < 0.05), and D (p < 0.001), compared to Group C, the voiding intervals were significantly shorter in Group D (p < 0.001) following AA irrigation (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).
3.Examination of androgen-related histological changes in bladder and blood vessels
The mean bladder smooth muscle/collagen ratios (m/c ratio) were 3.35 ± 0.72, 1.75 ± 0.59, 1.33 ± 0.25, and 0.97 ± 0.24 for A, B, C, and D groups. Compared with the A group, the m/c ratio was lower in the B, C, and D groups (P < 0.001), and compared to Group B and C, m/c ratio was significantly lower in Group D (p < 0.05), and (p < 0.01) (Fig. 3a). The mean m/c ratios at the iliac artery were 2.71 ± 0.89, 2.24 ± 0.68, 0.92 ± 0.46, and 0.56 ± 0.29 for A, B, C, and D groups. Compared to Group A, m/c ratio was significantly lower in Group C and D (p < 0.001), and compared to Group B, m/c ratio was significantly lower in Group C and D (p < 0.001), and compared to Group B, m/c ratio was significantly lower in Group C and D (p < 0.001), and compared to Group C, m/c ratio was significantly lower in Group D (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3b).