Usability of transperineal ultrasound for the evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse while using pessaries.

Govaerts J1, Vercruyssen J2, Neels H3, Jacquemyn Y4

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Conservative Management

Abstract 121
On Demand Conservative Management
Scientific Open Discussion Session 14
On-Demand
Imaging Pelvic Floor Pelvic Organ Prolapse Female
1. Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen; Universiteit Antwerpen, 2. Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, 3. Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen; Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), MOVANT, 4. Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen; Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC)
Presenter
J

Jolien Govaerts

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
An increase in the percentage of women suffering pelvic organ prolapse is suspected as life expectancy and the rate of obesity is increasing. Non-surgical treatment options of pelvic organ prolapse consist of pelvic floor muscle training, lifestyle adjustments, application of local estrogens and the use of a pessary. In the past, the impact of pessaries on symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse was mostly assessed by questionnaires on quality of life and sexual dysfunction.

This study is the first study to look at the possibility to perform adequate measurements of the pelvic floor with transperineal ultrasound with a pessary in situ and whether a pessary changes the functional anatomy of the pelvic floor.
Study design, materials and methods
This pilot study is designed as a monocentric cross-sectional study with a population of 20 patients who are about to start or already using a pessary to treat their symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. A paired samples t-test will be executed. A p-value below 0,05 is considered statistically significant.
Results
Only 13 patients were included due to the COVID 19 pandemic. Anterior compartment prolapse could be assessed in 12 of 13 patients. In 3 patients, hypermobility of the urethra was present without a pessary. However, with the pessary in place, the hypermobility disappeared. Significant anterior compartment prolapse was present in 3 patients, but none while the pessary was in situ. Statistically, a significant difference is found for bladder neck descent at maximal Valsalva maneuver and bladder neck difference with a p-value of 0,002. The central compartment could only be assessed in 5 patients. No significant difference in rectal ampulla descent was found.
Interpretation of results
Imaging of the pelvic floor and assessment of especially the anterior pelvic organ prolapse with a pessary in place is possible with transperineal ultrasound. Initial findings show an immediate improvement of the pelvic floor anatomy. The assessment of the cervix or vault when the pessary is in place is difficult because of the acoustic shadow of the pessary and because the echogenicity of the cervix or vault is similar to the surrounding tissue. Assessment of the central and posterior compartment failed to demonstrate a significant difference.
Concluding message
An increase in the percentage of women suffering pelvic organ prolapse is expected. Pessaries are a good non-surgical treatment option. However, extensive scientific research on their effectiveness is still lacking.  This pilot study shows that imaging of the pelvic floor and assessment of especially the anterior POP with a pessary in place is feasible with transperineal ultrasound. Initial findings show an immediate improvement of the pelvic floor anatomy.
Figure 1 Transperineal Ultrasound 2D sagittal view without pessary
Figure 2 Transperineal Ultrasound 2D sagittal view with pessary
Disclosures
Funding NONE Clinical Trial Yes Public Registry No RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee independent Ethics Committee UZA-UA Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
18/04/2024 10:02:01