Robotic buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty for ureteral stricture

Richard C1, Zhao L2, Hascoet J1, El Akri M1, Khene Z1, Graffeille V1, Verhoest G1, Mathieu R1, Bensalah K1, Peyronnet B1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Research Methods / Techniques

Abstract 37
Live Surgical Videos - Art in Motion
Scientific Podium Video Session 5
Friday 15th October 2021
14:30 - 14:40
Live Room 1
Genital Reconstruction New Devices New Instrumentation Robotic-assisted genitourinary reconstruction
1. Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France, 2. Department of Urology, New York University Langone Health, New York, USA
Presenter
B

Benoit Peyronnet

Links

Abstract

Introduction
Ureteral stricture is a well-known complication of ureteroscopy, especially if the procedure is repeated. There is still no clear consensus on the best way to manage those iatrogenic strictures. Robotic buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty has recently been described as a promising option for mid or upper ureter stricture  2 to 10 cm.
Design
We present the case of a 42 year-old male, with a iatrogenic ureteral stricture after 4 ureteroscopies for ureteral stone treatment. 
One attempt of endoscopic incision failed. The stricture was 3cm long, located at the iliac ureter level, with residual stone fragment stucked in the ureteral wall. 
The aim of this video was to describe the procedure of robot assisted buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty
Results
The procedure was supervised by an international expert in reconstructive urology by telementoring. The operating time was 180 minutes. The procedure begins by the identification of the left ureter. The intravenous injection of indocyanine green helped to visualize the proper vascularization of the ureter above and below the level of the stricture using  FireFly™ Near Infrared Fluorescence 
Once the stricture was sized a second team began to harvest the buccal mucosa graft in a standard fashion. 
The anterior aspect of the ureteral stricture was cut open longitudinally, until a 9CH flexible ureteroscope could be passed through. Flexible ureteroscopy ensured the quality of the tissues on both sides of the stricture. A double-J stent was placed. 
The graft was sutured on the ureteral incision area by two running sutures of 5/0 Pds. At the end of the procedure, omentum was suture onto the graft to provide adequate blood supply. No peri operative complication occurred. The patient was discharged two days after surgery and did not have recurrence of stenosis after double J-stent removal.
Conclusion
Robotic buccal Mucosa graft ureteroplasty is a feasible procedure and could decrease the perioperative morbidity compared to the existing surgical options. Innovative technologies such as the FireFly™ NIRF can be helpful for this procedure.
Disclosures
Funding 0 Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee CERU Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
18/04/2024 04:03:18