Urodynamic predictors of daytime and night-time urinary continence for robotic and open orthotopic ileal neobladders: results from two tertiary-care centres

Anceschi U1, Fede Spicchiale C2, Mari3, Brassetti A1, Tuderti1, Ferriero1, Bove A1, Misuraca1, Mastroianni1, Pastore S2, Mattioli4, Fuschi5, Amato I2, Finazzi Agrò E2, Pastore5, De Nunzio4, Gallucci M1, Carini3, Minervini3, Simone G1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urodynamics

Abstract 565
On Demand Urodynamics
Scientific Open Discussion Session 37
On-Demand
Incontinence Robotic-assisted genitourinary reconstruction Retrospective Study Urodynamics Techniques Quality of Life (QoL)
1. “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute – Department of Urologic Oncology, 2. “Policlinico Tor Vergata” – University of Rome – Department of Urology, 3. “AOU Careggi” – University of Florence – Department of Urology, 4. “Policlinico S. Andrea” – University of Rome -Department of Urology, 5. “ICOT Latina – Polo Pontino – La Sapienza – University of Rome – Department of Urology
Presenter
C

Claudia Fede Spicchiale

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladders (iONs) vary depending on the surgical technique performed. Standardization in reporting continence outcomes is lacking, as well as objective measurements with urodynamic assessment remains an historical issue. The aim of this pooled series was to identify urodynamic predictors of daytime and night-time urinary continence for robotic and open iONs performed at two high-volume centres.
Study design, materials and methods
Between June 2017 and December 2020 two prospective, board-approved, radical cystectomy dataset were matched and queried for “iON” “and “urodynamic evaluation” (n=66). Baseline data and complete urodynamic profile including uroflowmetry, cystometry, compliance, presence of residual peristaltic activity, abdominal leak point pressures (ALPP) as functional outcomes assessed by daytime and night-time continence (defined as the use of 0-1 pad) were reported. Descriptive analyses were used. Frequencies and proportions were reported for categorical variables while medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were reported for continuously coded variables. Daytime and nigh-time urinary incontinence probabilities were computed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared for baseline and urodynamic variables with the log-rank test, respectively.  Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of daytime and nightime urinary continence. For all analyses, a two-sided p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Overall, at a median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 7-19.5) 66 patients achieved a complete urodynamic evaluation. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, male patients achieved significantly higher rates of daytime urinary continence (Fig.1; p=0.03) while the presence of neobladder residual peristaltic activity and a maximal bladder pressure> 50 cmH20 were associated to significantly higher probabilities of night-time urinary incontinence (both p<0.05). At univariable Cox regression analysis male gender (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95; p=0.03) was predictor of daytime urinary continence while diabetes was predictor of night-time urinary continence (HR 5.77, 95% CI 1.24-26.7; p=0.02). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, neobladder residual peristaltic activity, (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.99; p=0.049) and maximal neobladder pressure >50cmH20 (HR 8.22, 95% CI 2-33.7; p=0.003) were all independent predictors of night-time urinary incontinence.
Interpretation of results
Basing on our data, the only predictor of daytime urinary continence appeared to be male gender: interestingly, at univariable regression analysis BMI, age and surgical approach were not found predictor of daytime or night-time urinary continence. Diabetes, which affected 3% of our cohort, was found the only predictor of night-time urinary continence, but since it affected only 2 patients, further studies are needed to validate this correlation. However, no independent predictors of day-time urinary continence were found at the multivariable analysis, whilst neobladder residual peristaltic activity and maximal neobladder pressure > 50 cmH2O were found independent predictors of night-time urinary incontinence, hence evaluating and treating these aspects could improve patients’ dryness and quality of life.
Concluding message
According to our data, males seemed to reach better continence rates than females, regardless to BMI, age and surgical approach. Hyperactivity and maximal bladder pressures>50 cmH20 at urodynamic evaluation are independent predictors of nocturnal urinary continence in both open and robotic iON. Medical treatment of increased pouch activity secondary to bowel peristalsis may enhance the night-time continence rate.
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis showing probability of daytime urinary continence according to gender
Figure 2 Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of night-time urinary incontinence
References
  1. Ferriero M, Simone G, Rocchegiani A et al . Early and late urodynamic assessment of Padua ileal bladder. Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1357-62
  2. Kretschmer A, Grimm T, Buchner A, Grimm J, Grabbert M, Jokisch F, Schneevoigt BS, Apfelbeck M, Schulz G, Bauer RM, Stief CG, Karl A. Prognostic Features for Objectively Defined Urinary Continence after Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Orthotopic Neobladder in a Contemporary Cohort. J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):210-215
  3. Zahran MH, Taha DE, Harraz AM et al. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy in women: orthotopic neobladder versus ileal loop conduit and impact of incontinence. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2017; 69: 262–70
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd It was a retrospective study Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
28/04/2024 15:38:22