YV plasty for vesico-urethral anastomosis stenosis by combined robotic and perineal approach and concomitant artificial urinary sphincter implantation

Freton L1, Graffeille V1, Khene Z1, Hascoet J1, Mathieu R1, Vesval Q1, Verhoest G1, Bensalah K1, Peyronnet B1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urethra Male / Female

Abstract 593
Robotic Bladder Neck, Artificial Urinary Sphincter, Reconstructive, Pediatric and Tapes
Scientific Podium Video Session 36
Saturday 10th September 2022
15:14 - 15:23
Hall K2
Robotic-assisted genitourinary reconstruction Bladder Outlet Obstruction Voiding Dysfunction Surgery Stress Urinary Incontinence
1. University of Rennes
In-Person
Presenter
B

Benoit Peyronnet

Links

Abstract

Introduction
There is no clear consensus regarding the management of recurrent post-prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) after failure of endoscopic treatments. Robotic YV plasty has been reported in that setting but in case of long stricture extending to the bulbar urethra, a purely robotic abdominal approach does not allow to treat the whole stricture. The purpose of this video was to describe a technique of YV urethroplasty by combined robotic and perineal approach for VUAS with concomitant artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.
Design
We present the case of  a 76-year-old man who had prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy in 2008 and then salvage prostatectomy in 2014. He then developed vesico-urethral anastomosis stenosis treated with endoscopic dilation and then intermittent self-dilatations. He had major stress urinary incontinence treated with a penis clamp with significant leakage (3-4 pads per day) upon clamp removal. He had no post-void residual. The urodynamic assessment showed an uninhibited detrusor contractions at 190mL and the cystoscopy confirmed the anastomotic stenosis.
Results
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia in Trendelenburg position. We use the Xi robot with 5 ports and a transperitoneal approach. The Retzius space is opened and dissected down to the bladder neck. A bulbo-membranous dissection by perineal approach is performed by the second operator. The dissections from the perineal and robotic abdominal approach meet below the pubic bone to free anterior part of the anastomosis. The stenosis is opened longitudinally. A bladder V-flap is moved down on the urethral opening using a barbed suture with the needle being passed below the pubic bone from the robotic to the perineal surgeon who performs the distal sutures of the anastomosis. The upper sutures of the anastomosis on each side of the bladder V-flap are then performed by the robotic surgeon. As the bulbar urethra has been dissected extensively, the AUS is implanted concomitantly. The patient was dicharged on day 3. The bladder catheter was removed on day 7 and of suprapubic tube at week 3. There were no postoperative complications. At 9 months there is no recurrence of stenosis and the patient is completely dry.
Conclusion
Combined robotic and perineal YV plasty for long VUAS involving the bulbar urethra is a feasible technique that can provide satisfactory results . A concomitant AUS implantation may be of interest although the possible increased risk of AUS erosion/infection compared to a staged approach should be further evaluated.
Disclosures
Funding No Clinical Trial No Subjects None
Citation

Continence 2S2 (2022) 100482
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2022.100482

26/04/2024 16:09:33