ICS 2024 Abstract Submission is now closed.
Thanks for participating and good luck with your reviews.
Authors will be notified on 17 May of their acceptance.
ICS 2024 Abstract Submission Centre was open from 1 February to 3 April, and due to unprecedented demand was extended until 11 April 2024 23:59 UTC.
ABSTRACT CATEGORIES
ICS invites Clinical and Non-Clinical Abstracts in Urology, Urogynecology, Colorectal, Bowel Dysfunction, Nursing, Physiotherapy, Conservative Management and Pure and Applied Science. Abstracts are accepted in the following categories:
CATEGORIES |
|
Anatomy / Biomechanics |
Nocturia |
Anorectal / Bowel Dysfunction |
Overactive Bladder |
Conservative Management |
Paediatrics |
Continence Care Products / Devices / Technologies |
Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
E-Health |
Pelvic Pain Syndromes |
Ethics |
Pharmacology |
Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction |
Pregnancy and Pelvic Floor Disorders |
Female Sexual Dysfunction |
Prevention and Public Health |
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) |
Prostate Clinical / Surgical |
Geriatrics / Gerontology |
Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences |
Health Services Delivery |
Rehabilitation |
Imaging |
Research Methods / Techniques |
Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction |
Transgender Health |
Male Sexual Dysfunction |
Urethra Male / Female |
Male Stress Urinary Incontinence (Post Prostatectomy Incontinence) |
Urodynamics |
Neurourology |
|
10 KEY POINTS TOWARDS A SUCCESSFUL ABSTRACT SUBMISSION!
Follow these steps to make the most of your submission!
- Read the submission rules! 5 min read containing key information!
- Lack of anonymity is automatic disqualification. Do not mention your name or the name of your clinic or university anywhere in your abstract text.
- The reviewers’ first score is for originality. If you’re presenting novel work, start the abstract with “this is the first….”or “this original…”.
- The next criterion is scientific merit. Your abstract must demonstrate your study to be scientifically sound.
- The methods of your abstract are scrupulously reviewed - make sure its a randomised trial or a well set up systematic review.
- Don’t split the results across several abstracts. Give absolute results and relative numbers.
- Ensure your conclusion responds to the question in your aims and is consistent with the results.
- Select the correct category and key words to ensure that your abstract is reviewed by someone in your discipline.
- For non-English speaking writers we recommend having your submission reviewed by someone who knows English well before submission.
- Make sure you use the correct and up to date ICS terminology. The use of obsolete terminology may cause rejection.