In 2019, the FDA recalled the use of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse procedures [1]. Following this announcement, the use of urethral slings also fell out of favor while procedures such as autologous fascial sling and colposuspensions became more popular as women and practitioners alike were seeking alternative SUI treatment options. The mid urethral sling (MUS) is currently the gold standard for the management of stress urinary incontinence. The MUS is both safer and more effective than a Burch Colposuspension [2]. For those that do not desire mesh, or have failed a prior procedure, the Burch Colposuspension remains a useful procedure [3]. The Robotic Burch is a minimally invasive, quick, and easy to perform procedure. Disadvantages of Burch Colposuspension may include cost, increased operative time, and potential lack of availability in ambulatory settings.

The Da Vinci Xi system is utilized with a 3 or 4 port configuration. An 8 mm camera trocar is placed in the umbilicus. An 8 mm trocar is placed 8 cm laterally on each side of the camera port. In a 4 port configuration, the #4 8 mm trocar is placed 8 cm laterally to the #3 arm. If an assistant port is desired, this can be placed 8 cm laterally to the #1 arm, at least 2 cm above the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). A Fenestrated Bipolar Forceps is utilized in the #1 arm. A Monopolar Scissors is utilized in the #3 arm. A Prograsp Forceps is utilized in the #4 arm in a 4 port configuration. The patient is placed in a steep Trendelenburg position.

A successful robotic colposuspension with a duration of less than 60 min total operation is performed.

The Robotic Burch Colposuspension is a minimally invasive procedure to manage stress urinary incontinence in those that do not desire a MUS, or have failed it. The Robotic Burch is a quick, easy, and minimally invasive approach to manage SUI.

Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants.” FDA, 2019, https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants.
F. Fusco, M. Abdel-Fattah, C.R. Chapple, M. Creta, S. La Falce, D. Waltregny, G Novara Update systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of femal stress urinary incontinence Euro. Urol., 72 (4) (2017), pp. 567-591, 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026 Epub 2017 May 4. PMID: 28479203
N. Viet-Rubin, J. Dubuisson, A. Ford, J.B. Dubuisson, S. Mourad, A Digesu Burch colposuspension Neurourol. Urodyn., 38 (2) (2019), pp. 553-562, 10.1002/nau.23905 Epub 2019 Jan 8. PMID: 30620096; PMCID: PMC6850136

Continence 15S (2025) 102109
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2025.102109