Correlation between Blaivas-Groutz and Solomon-Greenweel Nomograms in the diagnosis of female bladder outlet obstruction

Rubilotta E1, D'Amico A1, Mancini G1, Brunello D1, Casa P1, Aloe M1, MUSCO S2, SPINELLI P3, FRAGALA’ E4, FERRUZZI A5, Gubbiotti M6, AMMIRATI E7, GIAMMO’ A8, CHIERCHIA S9, MANCINI V10, Antonelli A1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urodynamics

Abstract 152
Urodynamics
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 17
Thursday 8th October 2026
15:22 - 15:30
Parallel Hall 4
0.10 Sydney
Capacity: 265
Urodynamics Equipment Bladder Outlet Obstruction Overactive Bladder
1. AOUI Verona, 2. Department of Neuro-Urology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy., 3. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy., 4. UO Urologia Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L. Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy., 5. Ospedale di Forlì, 6. Department of Urology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy., 7. SC Neuro-Urologia, Unità Spinale Unipolare (USU)-CTO, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy., 8. Unit of Neuro-Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., 9. Neuro-Urologia, CTO Unità spinale unipolare, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy., 10. Ospedale di Molfetta
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
To assess the correspondence in female bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) diagnosis between
Blaivas-Groutz (BG) and Solomon-Greenwell (SE) nomograms.
Study design, materials and methods
This was a multicentric study (6 centers) with data retrospectively collected in 2024 on neurological
and non-neurological females with suggested clinical BOO underwent videourodynamics (VUD).
BOO diagnosis was assessed by VUD criteria. We compared the BOO diagnosis of the two
nomograms with each other and with the VUD diagnosis. We compared BG classes (no BOO:0;
mild BOO: 1, Moderate BOO:2, Severe BOO:3) to SG criteria (<1 no BOO; 6-18 risk BOO >50%,
>18 risk BOO >90%), considering also SG score 1-5 for a further sub analysis.
Results
Data on 125 women (mean age 59.9 y.o.) were available: 63.2% (79) non neurological, 36.8% (46)
neurological. At BG, 4.8% (6) females were obstructed (mild BOO) but unobstructed at VUD. At
SG, 1 patient (0.8%) was obstructed but unobstructed at VUD, 9.6% (12) women were
unobstructed at SG but at VUD BOO was found. Overall, BOO diagnosis was coexistent in the two
nomograms in 84.8% (106). Women with BG 0 were 29 (23.2%), with a correspondent diagnosis at
SG (SG <1) in 96.6% (28/29); all these patients were unobstructed at VUD. In the 67 females with
BG 1, BOO at SG was in 70.7% (49/67): SG 1-5 28.6% (14), SG 6-18 36.7% (18), SG >18 34.7%
(17), intermediate SG class (1-18) 65.3% (32). Among 18 patients with BOO at BG and
unobstructed at SG, 12 (66.7%) were obstructed at VUD, 6 (33.3%) weren’t. Women of BG classes
2 and 3 were all obstructed at VUD and at SG. Of the 18 females with BG 2, 11.1% (2) had a SG
score 6-18 and 88.9% >18. All 11 women who showed BG 3 corresponded to a SG score >18.
Median SG score in BG 0 was -13.8, in BG 1 8.1, in BG 2 33.6, in BG 3 96.6.
Interpretation of results
An overall correspondence in BOO diagnosis between the two nomograms was found, but with
relevant differences regarding BOO severity. High relation was obtained in case of lack of BOO,
and in severe BOO. The greatest disagreement was found in case of mild BOO at BG, because
more than a quarter of these females were unobstructed at SG. In this group, a greater
concordance with BOO diagnosis at VUD was obtained by BG, while SG overestimated the
unobstruction. For these challenging patients, great care must be taken and VUD results remain
guides. The vast majority of patients with moderate BOO on BG showed very high scores on SG
with very increased likelihood of BOO (>90%, >18). It is like that in case of moderate/intermediate
BOO, the BG nomogram might underestimate the severity of obstruction. Regarding the diagnosis
of VUD, BG tends to overestimate BOO diagnosis, while SG to underestimate BOO.
Concluding message
A high correspondence was found between CG and SG nomograms in the BOO diagnosis.
However, in mild BOO a relevant disagreement was found. Respect to VUD, BG tends to
overestimate BOO diagnosis, while SG to underestimate BOO. VUD diagnosis is still the guide in
BOO diagnosis.
Disclosures
Funding No funding or grant Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd . Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102629
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102629

30/10/2026 12:46:39