Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Behavioral Interventions Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training as Adjuncts to Pharmacotherapy for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Pragmatic Trial

Davila Alvarez E1, Rivera Torres A1, Suarez M1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences

Gold Pass video coming soon
Find out more

Abstract 243
Quality of Life
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 27
Friday 9th October 2026
11:15 - 11:22
Parallel Hall 3
0.4 Brussels / 0.5 Paris
Capacity: 356
Urgency Urinary Incontinence Conservative Treatment Physiotherapy Quality of Life (QoL) Clinical Trial
1. Hospital Militar Escuela Dr. Alejandro Davila Bolaños Managua, Nicaragua
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) significantly impacts quality of life. While pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and behavioral interventions are recommended as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy, comparative data focusing on patient-reported outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to compare the effects of PFMT versus structured behavioral interventions, both combined with pharmacotherapy, on quality of life and patient-reported improvement in women with UUI.
Study design, materials and methods
This is a secondary analysis of a randomized, open-label, pragmatic clinical trial. Sample size was calculated based on the primary outcome of the main trial (ICIQ-SF change), assuming a clinically meaningful difference of 3 points, standard deviation of 4, α=0.05, and 80% power, yielding 28 participants per group. To account for potential attrition, 40 participants were enrolled per group.

Eighty women with UUI were allocated 1:1 to pharmacotherapy plus PFMT (Group A, n=40) or pharmacotherapy plus structured behavioral interventions (Group B, n=40). The primary outcome for this analysis was the change in ICIQ-LUTSqol score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes included Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and bladder diary parameters.

Between-group comparisons were performed using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Given the exploratory nature of this analysis, no adjustment was made for multiple comparisons. Ethical approval was obtained, and all participants provided written informed consent.
Results
Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life at week 8 (p<0.001 in both groups).

Behavioral interventions resulted in greater improvement in ICIQ-LUTSqol scores compared to PFMT (mean difference −4.45 points; 95% CI −8.94 to −0.01; p=0.047; Cohen’s d=0.45).

Patient-reported global improvement was high in both groups, with PGI-I responders (scores 1–3) observed in 95.0% of Group A and 97.5% of Group B.

In exploratory analyses, behavioral interventions showed greater reductions in urgency episodes (p=0.004), incontinence episodes (p=0.019), and pad use (p=0.023).
Interpretation of results
Both PFMT and structured behavioral interventions combined with pharmacotherapy resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in women with UUI. The greater improvement in quality of life observed with behavioral interventions, despite similar high rates of patient-reported global improvement, suggests additional benefits in patient-perceived disease burden. The moderate effect size (Cohen’s d=0.45) supports the clinical relevance of these findings. These results should be interpreted in the context of a secondary analysis.
Concluding message
Behavioral interventions combined with pharmacotherapy may offer greater improvements in quality of life and selected patient-reported outcomes compared to PFMT in women with UUI. These findings support the role of structured behavioral strategies as an effective and potentially accessible adjunct, particularly in settings where supervised pelvic floor therapy may be limited.
Disclosures
Funding No external Funding Clinical Trial Yes Registration Number NCT07259148 RCT Yes Subjects Human Ethics Committee Institutional Review Board (IRB) Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102720
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102720

21/10/2026 23:50:24