Impact of electrostimulation therapy on quality of life in patients with defecatory disorders in a high-volume colorectal unit in Mexico: a prospective study

Herrera Pineda A1, Jasqui Bucay A1, Hernandez Gomez M1, Alvarado Tamez E1, Oropeza Rodriguez G1, Perez Escobedo S1, Oordoñez Juarez J1, Vllanueva Herrero J1, Jimenez Bobadilla B1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences

Gold Pass video coming soon
Find out more

Abstract 249
Quality of Life
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 27
Friday 9th October 2026
12:00 - 12:07
Parallel Hall 3
0.4 Brussels / 0.5 Paris
Capacity: 356
Anal Incontinence Bowel Evacuation Dysfunction Constipation Rehabilitation Quality of Life (QoL)
1. Hospital General de Mexico
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Defecatory disorders, including dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence, are highly prevalent conditions that significantly impair quality of life (QoL) and represent a major burden on healthcare systems. These disorders are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly in resource-limited settings. Electrostimulation therapy has emerged as a minimally invasive therapeutic option aimed at improving neuromuscular coordination and anorectal function. However, evidence regarding its impact on patient-reported QoL outcomes across different diagnostic subgroups remains limited, especially in real-world clinical practice.

To prospectively evaluate changes in QoL in patients with defecatory disorders undergoing electrostimulation therapy and to compare outcomes across different diagnostic subgroups. Secondary aims included assessing the consistency of response and exploring the relationship between clinical improvement and QoL changes.
Study design, materials and methods
A prospective observational study was conducted in our center including patients diagnosed with defecatory disorders based on high-resolution anorectal manometry results, who underwent electrostimulation therapy. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected.
Quality of life was assessed using validated questionnaires (WHOQOL BREF) at baseline and after completion of therapy (min. 6 weeks). Clinical outcomes included symptom severity, frequency of bowel movements, and episodes of incontinence or obstructed defecation, depending on the underlying condition.
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes were compared to evaluate changes in quality of life. Correlations between clinical improvement and quality of life scores were also analyzed.
Results
A total of 24 patients were included (mean age 61 years, predominantly female). The most frequent diagnosis was dyssynergic defecation.
Mean baseline quality of life score was 59.5, which significantly improved to 70.4 after electrostimulation therapy, with a mean increase of 10.9 points.
Interpretation of results
Improvement was observed in the majority of patients (>90%), with only one patient showing no change. Subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent improvement across dyssynergic defecation types, while patients with fecal incontinence showed a mean increase of 12.5 points, albeit with some variability.
A positive correlation between clinical improvement and quality of life scores was observed.
Concluding message
Electrostimulation therapy is associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in patients with defecatory disorders. Benefits were observed across different diagnostic subgroups, particularly in dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence. These findings support the role of electrostimulation as an effective component of multidisciplinary pelvic floor management and highlight its applicability in high-volume clinical settings. Further studies with larger sample sizes and controlled designs are warranted to confirm these results.
Figure 1 Fig. 1 Score pre-electrostimulation therapy. Diagnostic 1: Dyssynergic defecation type 1. 2: Dyssynergic defecation type 2. 3: Dyssynergic defecation type 3. 4: Dyssynergic defecation type 4. 5: Fecal incontinence. 6: Fecal urgency.
Figure 2 Fig. 2 Score post-electrostimulation therapy. Diagnostic 1: Dyssynergic defecation type 1. 2: Dyssynergic defecation type 2. 3: Dyssynergic defecation type 3. 4: Dyssynergic defecation type 4. 5: Fecal incontinence. 6: Fecal urgency.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Ethic Commitee of the General Hospital of Mexico Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102726
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102726

22/10/2026 03:02:16