Hypothesis / aims of study
Defecatory disorders, including dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence, are highly prevalent conditions that significantly impair quality of life (QoL) and represent a major burden on healthcare systems. These disorders are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly in resource-limited settings. Electrostimulation therapy has emerged as a minimally invasive therapeutic option aimed at improving neuromuscular coordination and anorectal function. However, evidence regarding its impact on patient-reported QoL outcomes across different diagnostic subgroups remains limited, especially in real-world clinical practice.
To prospectively evaluate changes in QoL in patients with defecatory disorders undergoing electrostimulation therapy and to compare outcomes across different diagnostic subgroups. Secondary aims included assessing the consistency of response and exploring the relationship between clinical improvement and QoL changes.
Study design, materials and methods
A prospective observational study was conducted in our center including patients diagnosed with defecatory disorders based on high-resolution anorectal manometry results, who underwent electrostimulation therapy. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected.
Quality of life was assessed using validated questionnaires (WHOQOL BREF) at baseline and after completion of therapy (min. 6 weeks). Clinical outcomes included symptom severity, frequency of bowel movements, and episodes of incontinence or obstructed defecation, depending on the underlying condition.
Pre- and post-treatment outcomes were compared to evaluate changes in quality of life. Correlations between clinical improvement and quality of life scores were also analyzed.
Interpretation of results
Improvement was observed in the majority of patients (>90%), with only one patient showing no change. Subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent improvement across dyssynergic defecation types, while patients with fecal incontinence showed a mean increase of 12.5 points, albeit with some variability.
A positive correlation between clinical improvement and quality of life scores was observed.