Digital Interventions for Pelvic Floor Training in Pregnancy and Postpartum: What Works and What Drives Adherence?

Cristovao S1, Larsson M2, Lindh I3, Nordeman L4, Gutke A5

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

E-Health

Gold Pass video coming soon
Find out more

Abstract 336
Best of Rehabilitation
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 34
Friday 9th October 2026
17:22 - 17:30
Parallel Hall 4
0.10 Sydney
Capacity: 265
Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy Prevention Incontinence Conservative Treatment
1. Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Närhälsan Gibraltar Rehabilitation, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2. Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 4. Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden;Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, 5. Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Digital pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) interventions are increasingly used to support prevention and management of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). To our knowledge, this is the first mixed-methods systematic review integrating effectiveness and factors influencing adherence to digital PFMT interventions. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital PFMT for preventing and treating PFD during pregnancy and the first postpartum year, identify barriers and facilitators to PFMT adherence, and integrate quantitative and qualitative evidence using behaviour change theory to interpret behavioural mechanisms.
Study design, materials and methods
A mixed methods systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, using the Joanna Briggs Institute convergent segregated approach (1). PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from database inception to March 2025, and updated in January 2026. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies evaluating digital PFMT interventions delivered during pregnancy or the first postpartum year. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (2). The primary outcome was PFD symptom severity, including urinary and anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, sexual dysfunction and perineal pain. Secondary outcomes included pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, adherence, self-efficacy, quality of life, and knowledge. Quantitative data were synthesised using meta-analysis where appropriate and narrative synthesis otherwise. Qualitative data were synthesised using meta-aggregation. Findings were integrated using the Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model (3).
Results
Eighteen studies involving 4,916 participants were included. Digital PFMT reduced urinary incontinence during pregnancy, while postpartum effects were inconsistent. Improvements were observed in PFM function, adherence, and knowledge, whereas effects on self-efficacy and quality of life were mixed. Meta-aggregation generated five synthesized findings related to adherence, including knowledge and confidence, emotional and contextual demands, healthcare communication, sociocultural influences, and program usability. Integration using the COM-B model indicated that digital PFMT primarily targeted capability and opportunity, consistent with women’s accounts highlighting the importance of these dimensions for adherence. Although motivation emerged qualitatively as an important determinant of adherence, it was not directly measured in trials.
Interpretation of results
These findings indicate that digital PFMT effectiveness may not solely be determined by access to exercises alone, but arise through interactions with behavioural factors spanning individual, relational, and system levels. Accounting for the unique contextual demands experienced during pregnancy and the first year postpartum when developing digital PFMT interventions may help improve both effectiveness and adherence.
Concluding message
Digital PFMT interventions during pregnancy and the first year postpartum may support pelvic floor health when capability, opportunity, and motivation are addressed, although findings are inconsistent. This review highlights the need for future studies to consider behavioural mechanisms underpinning adherence when developing PFMT interventions.
Figure 1 Overview of Study Screening and Inclusion Process
Figure 2 Mapping of Quantitative and Qualitative Findings to COM-B Dimensions
References
  1. Lizarondo L, Carrier J, Godfrey C, Rieger K, Salmond S, Apostolo J, Kirkpatrick P, Loveday H. Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews. In: Aromataris E, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z,. editor. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: JBI; 2024
  2. Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information. 2018;34(4):285-91.
  3. Michie S, van Stralen M, West R. The behaviour cahange wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011;6(1):42.
Disclosures
Funding No funding was received for this study Clinical Trial No Subjects None AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102813
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102813

22/10/2026 06:00:29