Can a 3-day bladder diary be a surrogate for diagnosing detrusor overactivity in female lower urinary tract dysfunction?

Wu P1, Hsiao S2, Lin H2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract 387
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 102
Wednesday 7th October 2026
12:55 - 13:00 (ePoster Station 2)
Exhibition Hall
Detrusor Overactivity Voiding Diary Urgency Urinary Incontinence Female
1. National Taiwan University Hospital, 2. Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
To elucidate whether a 3-day bladder diary be a surrogate for diagnosing detrusor overactivity (DO) in female lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Study design, materials and methods
This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all female patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction who presented between July 2009 and December 2023 and underwent urodynamic testing. Patients with lack or incomplete bladder diary entries were excluded. DO is defined by involuntary contractions of the detrusor muscle during filling cystometry. The consistency between DO and bladder diary variables was compared.
Results
There were 2649 women in this review. A total of 149 women were diagnosing to have DO. Among them, a total of 79 patients had isolated phasic DO, 77 patients had isolated terminal DO, and 7 patients had both phasic and terminal DO (Table 1). A total of 1721 women were diagnosing to have urinary urgency based on their 3-day bladder diary, and 608 women had coexistent urinary incontinence. 
       The agreement between the DO and bladder diary derived urinary urgency was 37.33% with a kappa value of 0.0098 (p=0.074) and a McNemar’s value of 1488.67 (p<0.001) (Table 2).  
      The agreement between DO and bladder diary derived urinary urgency with coexistent urinary incontinence was 75.58% with a kappa value of 0.061 (p<0.001) and a McNemar’s  value of 325.63 (p<0.001) (Table 3). 
       If we use the subgroups of DO (i.e., phasic DO or terminal DO) instead of total DO to test the above consistency, the agreements remains poor, and the kappa value is low (Tables 4-7). 
      Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that nighttime urgency was a predictor of DO with an odds ratio of 1.059 (95% CI = 1.011 to 1.110, p=0.016), and daytime urgency was also a predictor of DO with an odds ratio of 1.021 (95% CI = 1.004 to 1.038, p=0.013). 
      Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that ≥2 episodes of nocturnal urgency was the cutoff for detecting DO with a sensitivity of 54.36 % and a specificity of 60.80%, and an area under the curve of  0.58, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.62, Figure 1), and ≥4 episodes of daytime urgency was the cutoff for detecting DO with a sensitivity of 47.65 %  and a specificity of 61.92%, and an area under the curve of  0.55, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.60, Figure 2).
Interpretation of results
Even with the addition of urinary incontinence, the concordance between DO and urinary urgency symptoms recorded in a 3-day bladder diary remains poor, with a low area under the curve. Therefore, a 3-day bladder diary cannot replace urodynamic study for the diagnosis of DO. However, for women with both urinary urgency and urinary incontinence, the concordance between DO and urinary urgency plus urinary incontinence is improved. This may suggest that DO appears to be more closely related to urinary urgency incontinence than to urinary urgency.
Concluding message
Due to poor concordance, a bladder diary cannot replace urodynamic study in diagnosing DO. Furthermore, DO appears to be more closely related to urinary urgency incontinence than to urinary urgency.
Figure 1 Tables 1 - 5
Figure 2 Tables 6 & 7, Figures 1 & 2
Disclosures
Funding nil Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd Will send fot IRB approval Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No AI Not at all
01/07/2026 01:13:07