Association Between Artificially Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Urinary Incontinence in Women: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in Northwestern Mexico

Castro Apodaca F1, Godoy N1, Heusinkveld J2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Prevention and Public Health

Abstract 437
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 102
Wednesday 7th October 2026
13:25 - 13:30 (ePoster Station 5)
Exhibition Hall
Incontinence Retrospective Study Questionnaire
1. University of Guadalajara, 2. University of Arizona
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Urinary incontinence affects up to 55% of women at some point in their lives, and this figure can exceed 70% in older women. It is defined as the involuntary loss of urine, and is generally classified, according to the International Continence Society (ISC), as: Stress incontinence, Urge urinary incontinence, and Mixed urinary incontinence. Urge incontinence is related to the consumption of non-caloric sweeteners.
The main mechanism is related to alterations of the detrusor muscle of the bladder (the specialized muscle of its wall), such as hyperactivity, poor distensibility or bladder hypersensitivity.
The possible link between artificial sweeteners and urinary incontinence is that, when eliminated through urine, some sweeteners, such as acesulfame K, aspartame, and sodium saccharin, come into direct contact with the bladder. Research suggests that these substances can increase detrusor muscle contraction, even at low concentrations.
A UK study by Jaydipi Dasgupta and colleagues proposed that the pathophysiological mechanism involves increased calcium influx into bladder smooth muscle cells. Since calcium is a key mediator of muscle contraction, its intracellular increase promotes stronger and/or more frequent detrusor muscle contractions, which could contribute to the development of urinary urgency symptoms.

Research hypothesis: Higher consumption of artificially sweetened beverages is associated with a higher prevalence (or likelihood) of urinary incontinence symptoms in women.
Study design, materials and methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted at a hospital in Northwest Mexico (n = 88). UI subtypes (urge, stress, and mixed) were assessed using instruments adapted from the ICIQ-UI Short Form. ASB exposure was categorized as use of table sweeteners, consumption of diet soft drinks, and combined consumption. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests with Haldane-Anscombe odds ratios (ORs), Spearman correlation, and multivariable binary logistic regression with Welch-corrected t-tests.
Results
The overall prevalence of UI was 50.0%. The use of artificial sweeteners was significantly associated with any type of urinary incontinence (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.57–9.43; p = 0.005). Multivariable logistic regression identified sweetener consumption as the only significant independent predictor of any type of urinary incontinence (adjusted OR = 4.74, 95% CI: 1.80–12.47; p = 0.002), independent of age, BMI, and parity. Age was the only significant predictor of exertional urinary incontinence (OR = 1.12/year, 95% CI: 1.05–1.21; p = 0.001), while artificial sweetener consumption showed a limited statistical trend (OR = 2.94; p = 0.055).
Interpretation of results
Consumption of artificial sweeteners increases the likelihood of urinary incontinence almost fivefold in Mexican women, regardless of BMI or obstetric history.
Concluding message
These findings support dietary counseling aimed at reducing artificial sweetener consumption as a potential modifiable strategy for the treatment of urinary incontinence in this population.
Figure 1 Figure 1. Prevalence of urinary incontinence subtypes according to sweetener consumption and the dose-response relationship with the frequency of ASB (n=88)
Figure 2 Figure 2. Multivariate logistic regression forest plot for stress UI and OR heat map according to ASB exposure type and UI subtype (n=88)
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Hospital de la Mujer, Culiacan Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
07/06/2026 03:52:27