Momentary Relationships Between Anxiety and Urinary Urgency

A. Grace K1, Benjamin J2, Aaron L3, Tatsuki K3, Stephen B3, Elisabeth S3, John S4, Julianna L3, Roger D3, Lindsey M3

Research Type

Pure and Applied Science / Translational

Abstract Category

Overactive Bladder

Abstract 518
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 104
Thursday 8th October 2026
10:35 - 10:40 (ePoster Station 3)
Exhibition Hall
Overactive Bladder Prospective Study Urgency/Frequency
1. George Mason University; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2. Fairleigh Dickinson University, 3. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 4. Virginia Common Wealth University
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Anxiety is reported in up to 48% of individuals with OAB and has detrimental impacts on quality of life [1, 2]. Although cross-sectional research indicates a positive relationship between anxiety and OAB symptoms, both anxiety and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), such as urinary urgency, vary in daily life and are not well-captured at a single time point. This study applied ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine concurrent and lagged relationships between anxiety and LUTS among individuals with and without OAB.
Study design, materials and methods
The current research utilizes data from two studies. For each study, individuals with active OAB symptoms (OAB v3≥4) and healthy controls (HC) were recruited to complete a series of daily prompts evaluating affective symptoms (e.g. anxiety) and LUTS (e.g. urgency) by rating each on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). Participants completed measures at 4 daily prompts over 7 days for each study. Because participants could complete one or both studies, up to 28 (one study - 7 days) or 56 (both studies - 14 days) diary entries were available for analysis.  Multilevel models (MLMs) with measurement occasions (Level 1) nested within individuals (Level 2) were used to predict contemporaneous and subsequent urinary urgency via anxiety. To model effects of anxiety on subsequent urinary urgency, anxiety at time t was used to predict urinary urgency at the next timepoint (t+1), while controlling for time t urinary outcomes.
Results
363 participants (277 OAB, 86 HC) (M age = 47.36, 67.8% White) completed baseline measures and 325 completed EMA. Anxiety concurrently predicted urinary urgency (b = .11, p < .0001). Anxiety also predicted urgency at the following timepoint (b = .045, p = .014). However, this effect was no longer significant when controlling for current urinary urgency, b = .03, p = .08.
Interpretation of results
These results suggest that anxiety is related to increased urinary urgency in individuals with and without OAB. Anxiety appears to have both concurrent and delayed relationships with urinary urgency. However, the relationship between anxiety and urgency at the next time point was attenuated after controlling for current urgency, suggesting that the relationship may be explained by a shared  risk profile characterized by elevated anxiety and urgency, rather than an independent impact of anxiety on later urgency.
Concluding message
Our findings confirm cross-sectional evidence for positive relationships between anxiety and urinary urgency. Further, these findings are the first to test and affirm theoretical models proposing the delayed impact of anxiety on LUTS.  Future research should explore mechanistic links between psychological and urinary symptoms in OAB.
References
  1. Lai HH, Rawal A, Shen B, Vetter J. The Relationship Between Anxiety and Overactive Bladder or Urinary Incontinence Symptoms in the Clinical Population. Urology. 2016 Dec;98:50–7. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.013
  2. Reynolds WS, McKernan LC, Dmochowski RR, Bruehl S. The biopsychosocial impacts of anxiety on overactive bladder in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42:778-784. doi:10.1002/nau.25152
Disclosures
Funding This project was supported by NIH (NIDDK) awards DK129624, DK128293 and CTSA award No.?UL1 TR002243 ?from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Vanderbilt University Medical Center Institutional Review Board Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
11/10/2026 04:18:42