Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Diagnostic Methods

Abawa A1, Bidkhori H1, Hennes D1, Skinner S2, Vereeck S3, Paul K1, Darzi S1, Karjalainen P4, Werkmeister J1, Webb J1, Mukherjee S1, Rosamilia A3

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Pelvic Pain Syndromes

Abstract 629
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 105
Thursday 8th October 2026
13:15 - 13:20 (ePoster Station 6)
Exhibition Hall
Pain, other Pain, Pelvic/Perineal Biomechanics Physiotherapy Quality of Life (QoL)
1. Monash University and Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 2. Monash University, 3. Monash Health, 4. Hospital Nova, Finland
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is a common yet underdiagnosed musculoskeletal disorder that affects women during pregnancy and postpartum. While symptoms often resolve, a considerable proportion of women experience persistent pain for years, leading to functional limitations and reduced quality of life [1]. Despite European clinical guidelines (2008) and postpartum updates (2022), PGP remains inconsistently recognised, variably diagnosed, and inadequately managed in routine antenatal and postnatal care [2,3]. This comprehensive systematic review aimed to: (1) estimate the pooled prevalence of PGP in pregnancy and postpartum, (2) identify key obstetric, biomechanical, and psychosocial risk factors associated with persistent postpartum PGP, and (3) synthesise evidence on clinically utilised diagnostic methods to inform standardised practice.
Study design, materials and methods
Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, six databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Emcare, Scopus, PEDro) were searched from inception. Observational studies reporting PGP in pregnancy or postpartum were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled proportions and effect sizes for associated risk factors. Where quantitative synthesis was not feasible, findings were summarised narratively. Heterogeneity (I²), publication bias (Egger’s and Begg’s tests), and subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design, trimester, diagnostic test, and follow-up period. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
Results
Thirty studies comprising a total of 142,447 participants were included. Prevalence estimates of PGP during pregnancy varied widely, with a pooled estimate of up to 61% (95% CI: 51–71, I2 = 97%, p < 0.001) derived from seven studies, most of which reported data from the third trimester.  Postpartum prevalence was similarly variable, with a pooled estimate of up to 28% (95% CI: 17–38, I2 = 99.9%, p < 0.001) based on fourteen studies. Emotional distress measured at one and two time points during pregnancy was significantly associated with persistent postpartum PGP (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15-1.59; OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.40-2.13, respectively). Positive bilateral posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.30-2.27) and prior low back pain (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.43-2.50) were also significantly associated with postpartum PGP. Diagnostic practices varied widely across studies; the P4 test was the most frequently reported clinical examination, followed by the active straight leg raise (ASLR) test. No diagnostic gold standard was identified.
Interpretation of results
These findings indicate that PGP represents a significant maternal health morbidity. The association between antenatal emotional distress and persistent postpartum PGP highlights the importance of psychosocial factors in symptom chronicity. In addition, clinical indicators such as a positive P4 test and prior low back pain suggest potential for early identification of women at risk. However, the substantial heterogeneity and lack of diagnostic gold standards limit consistency in diagnosis and may contribute to underdiagnosis. These findings support the need for a multidimensional approach integrating clinical and psychosocial assessment.
Concluding message
Pelvic girdle pain affects over half of pregnant women and persists postpartum in nearly one‑third. Early recognition of key risk factors, standardisation of diagnostic methods, and integration of psychosocial screening into routine antenatal care are essential to improve detection and mitigate the long‑term impact on maternal well‑being.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram for systematic review and meta-analysis
Figure 2 Summary of diagnostic methods for pelvic girdle pain
References
  1. Bergström C, Persson M, Nergård KA, Mogren I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):399.
  2. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Östgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. European Spine Journal. 2008 Jun;17(6):794-819.
  3. Simonds AH, Abraham K, Spitznagle T. Clinical practice guidelines for pelvic girdle pain in the postpartum population. The Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy. 2022 Jan 1;46(1):E1-38.
Disclosures
Funding Monash International Graduate Scholarships, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia and Medical Research Future Fund, Australia Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd In this review, ethical approval was not required, as the authors were utilizing secondary data that have already been collected and published. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
18/08/2026 13:10:05