Delayed clinical outcomes of combined platelet-rich plasma and shock wave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Epifanova M1, Artemenko S1, Kostin A1, Epifanov A1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Male Sexual Dysfunction

Abstract 663
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 106
Thursday 8th October 2026
15:55 - 16:00 (ePoster Station 2)
Exhibition Hall
Clinical Trial Conservative Treatment Sexual Dysfunction Stem Cells / Tissue Engineering
1. RUDN University
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Previous studies investigating the correction of erectile dysfunction (ED) using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have demonstrated variable therapeutic effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term (delayed) outcomes of ESWT and combined PRP + ESWT therapy in patients with ED.
Study design, materials and methods
A total of 164 men with ED were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group 1 (n = 82) received penile ESWT (Dornier Aries) twice weekly for 6 weeks (mean age 40.1 years [20–69]; mean ED duration 4.1 years [0.5–19]). Group 2 (n = 82) received two sessions per week for 6 weeks: Session 1 included ESWT followed by intrapenile PRP injections, with PRP subsequently activated by ESWT; Session 2 consisted of ESWT alone (mean age 45.6 years [19–71]; mean ED duration 3.7 years [0.5–16]). Comparative assessments were performed at baseline, day 60, and 6 months after therapy using IIEF-5, EHS, SEP, GAQ, and penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU; median [IQR]). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the RUDN University Medical Institute.
Results
At day 60, both groups showed significant improvement in erectile function according to IIEF-5, EHS, SEP, GAQ, PSV, and RI (p < 0.05). The combined PRP + ESWT therapy demonstrated superior outcomes compared to ESWT monotherapy (p < 0.05). By 180 days, Group 1 (ESWT alone) demonstrated a decline in all parameters compared to the 60-day results:  IIEF-5 decreased from 20.2 (15.9–22.6) to 19.6 (13.8–22) (p > 0.05);  SEP remained unchanged at 3 (2–4) (p > 0.05);  EHS declined from 3 (2.4–3) to 2.1 (2–3) (p > 0.05). PDDU revealed a significant reduction in PSV from 25.8 cm/s (20.2–28.9) to 21.4 (19–27.5) (p < 0.05), while RI changed from 0.91 (0.81–1) to 0.9 (0.8–0.97) (p > 0.05). At day 60, 55 patients (67%) reported improvement per GAQ, decreasing to 40 (48.8%) at 6 months. In Group 2 (PRP + ESWT), IIEF-5 slightly decreased from 19.6 (17–23) at 60 days to 19.0 (16–22) at 180 days (p > 0.05).  SEP changed from 3.8 (3–4) to 3.5 (2.7–4) (p > 0.05);  EHS from 3 (3–4) to 2.7 (2.5–3.5) (p > 0.05).  PDDU showed minor changes in PSV from 28 cm/s (23.3–34.9) to 25.8 (23–31.8) (p > 0.05) and RI from 1 (0.88–1) to 0.9 (0.86–1) (p > 0.05). Positive GAQ responses were reported by 68 men (82.9%) at 60 days and 59 (71.9%) at 180 days. Overall, both groups demonstrated a slight decline in outcomes at 6 months, but a significant reduction in PSV was observed only in Group 1. Intergroup comparison confirmed that combination therapy (Group 2) provided higher erectile function scores according to SEP, EHS, and PDDU, with the effect persisting even after 6 months (p < 0.05).
Interpretation of results
Both ESWT and combined PRP + ESWT therapy were well tolerated and effective in improving erectile function. The combination of PRP with ESWT demonstrated greater efficacy and sustained benefits at long-term follow-up, making it a more promising therapeutic option for ED management.
Concluding message
N/A
Disclosures
Funding NA Clinical Trial Yes Registration Number The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the RUDN University Medical Institute ? 325. RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the RUDN University Medical Institute ? 325. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
18/08/2026 13:19:00