Hypothesis / aims of study
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent syndrome among women, with a significant negative impact on quality of life. Multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in patients with OAB refractory to pharmacological treatment.
Other studies have demostrated the non-inferiority of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (tPTNS) versus percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (pPTNS) in OAB refractory to other treatment.
However, no studies have compared the efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous PTNS.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous PTNS in women with idiopathic OAB.
Study design, materials and methods
Two cohorts of 51 women with idiopathic OAB were retrospectively compared.
Group 1 (n=25) received unilateral pPTNS, and Group 2 (n=26) received bilateral pPTNS. Both groups underwent one session per week for a total of 12 weeks.
Patients were evaluated using a 3-day bladder diary (daytime frequency, nocturia, and daily incontinence episodes), validated questionnaires such as OAB-V8 and ICIQ-SF, and treatment satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale.
Interpretation of results
Statistically significant differences were observed in patient satisfaction and the number of daily incontinence episodes.
Patients treated with bilateral PTNS reported higher satisfaction (3.88 in Group 1 vs 4.35 in Group 2, p<0.021) and a greater reduction in daily incontinence episodes (1.5 in Group 1 vs 0.5 in Group 2, p<0.0001).