Hypothesis / aims of study
Women account for 36% of the world’s sport climbing population [1]. Sport climbing places high demands on the musculoskeletal system through vertical dynamic loads, prolonged isometric phases, and increased requirements for motor coordination and flexibility [2]. These mechanisms contribute to repeated challenges in relation to intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Elevated IAP is a well-recognized mechanism underlying stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Both vertical constraints (gravity, acceleration) and horizontal constraints (muscle contractions and breathing) have been described as intrinsic factors influencing continence [3]. However, practice-related contexts and climbing-specific movements associated with UI remain poorly identified.
The aim of this study was to assess practice-related contexts and triggering movements among women suffering from climbing-induced UI.
Study design, materials and methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among women presenting with climbing-induced UI. Associations between UI and practice-related contexts as well as triggering movements were reported. Statistical analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR), p-values, and Cramer’s V coefficient, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
Eighty-four female climbers were included (median age: 36 years; median weight: 58.5 kg; 46.4% nulliparous). Practice duration was not associated with urinary incontinence (UI) (< 1 year vs > 1 year: OR = 1.62; p = 0.176). In contrast, several practice-related factors were significantly associated with UI: climbing frequency > 3 sessions/week (OR = 2.14; p = 0.039), session duration > 2 hours (OR = 2.34; p < 0.001), bouldering level > 6c (OR = 2.19; p = 0.04), increased exercise intensity (OR = 52.2; p < 10⁻³⁰), and stress or anxiety related to the activity (OR = 11.1; p < 10⁻¹⁹).
Overall analysis suggested a higher frequency of leakage during bouldering compared with outdoor climbing.
Triggering movements most strongly associated with SUI were post-exercise phase, with a fivefold increased risk (OR = 5.11; p = 0.010), maximal effort (OR = 4.55; p < 0.001), falls and ground landings (OR = 3.76; p = 0.002), and leg push-offs (OR = 2.75; p = 0.026). Breath-holding or static effort (35.7%), dynos (30.9%), and heel hooks (28.6%) were also frequently reported. Analysis by biomechanical categories showed no significant difference between vertical and horizontal constraints (OR = 1.00; p = 0.99).
Interpretation of results
The demographic characteristics suggest that UI does not exclusively affect profiles traditionally considered at obstetric risk. Similarly, the duration of climbing practice does not constitute a determining factor. This finding suggests that the underlying mechanisms are more likely related to acute and cumulative constraints associated with practice rather than to a progressive phenomenon linked to medical history or years of exposure. Finally, leakage appears to be related to specific climbing movements rather than to a single global biomechanical constraint, with involvement of both vertical and horizontal forces as well as other movement patterns suggesting different causal mechanisms.