Laparoscopic Implantation of a Female Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Complex Cases: A Minimally Invasive Alternative in the Robotic Era

Márquez Güémez C1, Saavedra Centeno M1, Velasco Balanza C1, Pelari Mici L1, Perez Perez M1, Casado Varela J1, Celada Luis G1, Molina Escudero R1, Quicios Dorado C1, Cogorno Wasylkoski L1, Costal M1, San José Manso L1, López-Fando Lavalle L1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Abstract 746
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 108
Friday 9th October 2026
13:25 - 13:30 (ePoster Station 2)
Exhibition Hall
Female Incontinence Retrospective Study Stress Urinary Incontinence New Devices
1. La Princesa University Hospital
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Introduction
Female artificial urinary sphincter (fAUS) implantation represents a salvage option in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), particularly after failure of previous surgical treatments. Although the recent expansion of this procedure has been largely driven by robotic surgery, laparoscopy may offer a minimally invasive, reproducible, and safe alternative.

Objective
To evaluate perioperative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic fAUS implantation in a tertiary referral center and to descriptively compare these results with contemporary literature, predominantly based on robotic approaches.
Study design, materials and methods
A single-center retrospective study including a series of 15 women who underwent posterior laparoscopic fAUS implantation (May 2022–March 2026), all performed by a single surgeon. Patients with refractory SUI due to ISD were included. Baseline, perioperative, and functional variables were analyzed (ICIQ-UI-SF, ICIQ-FLUTSsex, ICIQ-LUTSqol, PGI-I, 24-hour pad test). Continence was defined as both social continence and objective dryness at last follow-up. Descriptive (median [IQR]) and inferential analyses (Wilcoxon test) were performed. Revision-free survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Results
Fifteen patients were included (median age 67 years [59–78.5]), with a high degree of complexity (60% prior incontinence surgery, 46.7% prior mesh removal, 20% neurological disease). Median operative time was 135 minutes [117.5–170], and median hospital stay was 2 days [2–2.5]. Intraoperative complications occurred in 20.0% of cases and postoperative complications (<90 days) in 40.0%, with 6.7% classified as Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III.

A significant improvement was observed in all functional outcomes: ICIQ-UI-SF scores decreased from 19.5 to 3.0 at 6 months and 1.5 at 1 year (p<0.001), and the 24-hour pad test decreased from 1250 mL to 70 mL (p<0.001). Objective dryness rate was 78.6% at both 6 months and 1 year, while social continence reached 93.3%.

One revision (6.7%) was recorded due to pump extrusion requiring partial explantation at 240 days, with no complete explants. Revision-free survival was 93.3%. Outcomes were comparable to those reported in robotic series, with continence and reintervention rates within the lower range of published data.
Interpretation of results
According to the European Association of Urology, the female artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is reserved for refractory stress urinary incontinence in specialized centers. Our cohort, characterized by high complexity, appropriately reflects this indication. Continence outcomes (93.3% social continence, 78.6% objective dryness) are consistent with leading series (70–85%), with significant quality-of-life improvement.

The posterior laparoscopic approach demonstrates perioperative and functional outcomes comparable to robotic surgery, for which no clear clinical superiority has been established, supporting laparoscopy as an accessible alternative. Complication and revision rates (6.7%) are in line with reports in complex populations, with high revision-free survival (93.3%).

Despite limitations (retrospective design, small sample size), our findings support laparoscopic AUS as a safe and effective option in experienced centers, consistent with current European recommendations.
Concluding message
Laparoscopic fAUS implantation is a safe and effective procedure, with functional and safety outcomes comparable to robotic surgery, representing a valid minimally invasive alternative when robotic systems are not available.
Disclosures
Funding Not funded Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd According to our institutional policies and applicable regulation, this work is a retrospective, single-center observational study based on data collected during routine clinical practice. No additional interventions were performed, and patient management was not altered for research purposes. All data were analyzed in an anonymized manner, ensuring full compliance with current data protection regulations. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
14/10/2026 01:37:39