Psychological profiles of women with Chronic and recurrent urinary tract infections

Windgassen S1, Poulter H2, Allen S3

Research Type

Pure and Applied Science / Translational

Abstract Category

Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences

Abstract 784
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 108
Friday 9th October 2026
12:35 - 12:40 (ePoster Station 5)
Exhibition Hall
Female Quality of Life (QoL) Infection, Urinary Tract Physiotherapy
1. King's College London, 2. Teesside University, 3. Northumbria University
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for 3 million healthcare consultations in the UK every year, equating up to 6% of all medical visits. Around 20-30% of women will experience recurrence of UTIs with a lifetime incidence of 50-60% in adult women. Recurrent/chronic UTIs (RUTI) are symptomatic UTIs that follow resolution of a previous UTI. 

The physical discomfort of RUTI, the lack of appropriate testing and consensus on effective treatment pathways causes substantial psychological and physiological burden. Recent research suggests that there may be a bidirectional relationship between anxiety and depression and RUTI through systemic pathways involving the neuroendocrine and immune system pathways. 

The study aimed to explore the existence of distinct psychological coping and support profiles of  women who currently or previously experienced recurrent or chronic urinary tract infections and whether these profiles would impact symptom status.
Study design, materials and methods
Data was collected in a cross-sectional online survey disseminated in collaboration with patient advocacy non-profit, Live UTI Free and on social media. A Latent Profile Analysis using JAMOVI was conducted to classify survey participants based on clustering of responses to a range of latent characteristics (well-being, illness perceptions, social support [health-related; relational and allied health social support] and psychological strategies [positive and negative]). All profiling variables were converted to standardized Z-scores to facilitate comparison between profiles. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted in JAMOVI to determine significant profile differences in severity, recovery, and symptoms.
Results
Data of 785 women was used for analysis. Latent profile analysis indicated the emergence of three distinct profiles: (1) independent self-managers, (2) allied health support seekers and (3) heightened support needs. Independent self-managers had the highest levels of psychological wellbeing, engaged in active coping strategies, utilised health and social support but had lower levels of use of allied-healthcare professional support and lower illness perceptions. 
Allied health support seekers had the highest access to allied health professional support, as well as engaging in health and social support and had average psychological wellbeing, coping strategies and illness perceptions. Those in the heightened support needs profile, had the worse psychological wellbeing, highest level of negative illness perceptions and reduced coping and support access (across health, allied and social support). 
One-way ANOVAs revealed that independent self managers had lower levels of symptoms compared to the other two profiles. Independent self managers also had less severe symptoms compared to those with heightened support needs but not alien health support seekers.
Interpretation of results
Coping and support needs for women experiencing RUTI vary. Psychological wellbeing, illness perceptions and coping strategies covary with symptom status and recovery, suggesting that they may also impact symptom trajectory although more research is needed. The present results demonstrate that individuals who have poorer psychological wellbeing, and more negative illness perceptions may benefit from additional allied health professional support to improve quality of life and potentially symptom experiences.
Concluding message
Patients experiencing RUTI are impacted by care clarity, quality and continuity. The more clarity, trust and opportunity for review, the better able a patient is to self-manage and ultimately have lesser symptoms and better chance at recovery. Identifying patients who are struggling psychologically and practically and coordinating or signposting to additional support, may improve self-management prospects as well as symptom trajectory.
References
  1. Medina M, Castillo-Pino E. An introduction to the epidemiology and burden of urinary tract infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2019 May 2;11:1756287219832172. doi: 10.1177/1756287219832172. PMID: 31105774; PMCID: PMC6502976.
  2. EAU (2023) Urological infections. European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org
  3. Charles Lung-Cheng Huang, Ming-Ping Wu, Chung-Han Ho, Jhi-Joung Wang, The bidirectional relationship between anxiety, depression, and lower urinary track symptoms: A nationwide population-based cohort study, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Volume 100, 2017, Pages 77-82, ISSN 0022-3999,
Disclosures
Funding This study was funded by Teesside University QR funding (Participatory Research Funding Call 2022/23: 4000005). Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee This project received approval from Teesside University’s ethics sub-committee School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University (ref:10138). Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
15/10/2026 08:37:05