Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain: Relationships with Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Low Back Pain-Related Disability

Hagovska M1, Hroncova M2, Oravcova K3, Svihra J4

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Rehabilitation

Abstract 803
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 108
Friday 9th October 2026
12:45 - 12:50 (ePoster Station 6)
Exhibition Hall
Pain, other Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation
1. Department of Physiatry, Balneology, and Medical Rehabilitation, Institution - Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia, 2. Rehab Care, s.r.o., Košice, University of St. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Faculty of Health Sciences, Piešťany, Slovakia, 3. Department of Physiatry, Balneology, and Medical Rehabilitation, Institution - Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia, 4. Department of Urology, Institution – Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is a common postpartum complaint and may co-occur with pelvic floor symptoms and low back pain-related disability [1] This study aimed to evaluate the association between clinically relevant postpartum PGP, pelvic floor symptom impact, and low back pain-related disability in postpartum women.
Study design, materials and methods
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in accordance with STROBE guidelines, from January to December 2024. Eligible participants were women aged ≥18 years who were 3–12 months postpartum after vaginal delivery or caesarean section. Exclusion criteria included pre-pregnancy or pre-delivery PGP, pelvic floor pain/dysfunction, or back pain; a history of urogynaecologic disease; serious psychiatric, neurologic, internal, orthopaedic, or oncologic disease; ongoing physiotherapy; and incomplete questionnaires.
Validated questionnaires were used: the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ; clinically relevant PGP defined as a PGQ total score ≥28), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire–Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Associations between PGQ, PFIQ-7, and ODI scores were assessed using Spearman’s correlation, and differences between women with non-clinically relevant versus clinically relevant PGP were evaluated using an ANOVA test (p < 0.05).
The sample size was determined using the following formula: n = Z2P(1−P)/d2 (Z = 1.96 for a 95% confidence level; p = 0.4 for the maximum expected prevalence of PGP; and d = 0.05 for a 10% confidence interval). Based on this calculation, we aimed to recruit at least 369 participants. To account for an anticipated 20% dropout rate, the minimum sample size was increased to 443 women.
Results
Of 920 women recruited, 791 (86.0%) met the eligibility criteria; 129 were excluded mainly due to pelvic/back pain prior to delivery (n = 52), a history of urogynaecologic disease (n = 33), serious comorbidities (n = 9), incomplete questionnaires (n = 23), or ongoing physiotherapy (n = 12).
Regarding maternal/obstetric characteristics, age, gestational weight gain, and infant birth weight did not differ significantly between groups, whereas pre-pregnancy BMI was higher in women with clinically relevant PGP (25.65 ± 5.45 vs 24.11 ± 4.73; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for delivery mode, episiotomy, epidural analgesia, or twin pregnancy; however, assisted vaginal delivery (vacuum/forceps) differed significantly, with a higher proportion in the pain group.
Correlation analysis showed strong positive associations between PGP severity and co-occurring symptoms: PGQ correlated with ODI (r = 0.716) and with PFIQ-7 total (r = 0.753). Correlations were moderate-to-strong for PFIQ-7 bladder (r = 0.668), bowel/rectum (r = 0.541), and vagina/pelvis (r = 0.690) domains (all p < 0.001). Correlations with age, gestational weight gain, parity, and infant birth weight were not significant; BMI showed only a weak correlation (r = 0.113; p = 0.001).
Interpretation of results
PGP severity was strongly associated with both pelvic floor symptom impact and low back pain-related disability, suggesting that postpartum PGP often co-occurs with a broader lumbopelvic and pelvic floor symptom burden rather than presenting as an isolated complaint.
Concluding message
Given the strong association with low back pain-related disability and the moderate-to-strong association with pelvic floor symptom impact, postpartum screening and management may benefit from an integrated approach addressing both lumbopelvic function and pelvic floor symptoms.
Figure 1 Table 1. Correlations with PGQ total score (Spearman)
References
  1. Wiezer M, Hage-Fransen MAH, Otto A, et al. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102154.
Disclosures
Funding None declared Clinical Trial Yes Public Registry No RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Ethics Committee of the Košice Self-Governing Region, Slovakia Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
07/06/2026 06:21:45