Pelvic Floor Morphometry and Functional Contractility in Two Geographically Distinct Cohorts of Healthy Adults

Khowailed I1, Moustafa I1, Alnakhi W2, Lootah M1, Marilyn M3, Al-Sharman A4, Abdelrahman F1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Anatomy / Biomechanics

Abstract 815
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 108
Friday 9th October 2026
13:45 - 13:50 (ePoster Station 6)
Exhibition Hall
Anatomy Pelvic Floor Physiology
1. Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates., 2. Department of Family and Community Medicine and Behavioral Science, University of Sharjah College of Medicine, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of St, Augustine for Health Sciences at San Diego, San Diego, 92069, CA, United States, 4. Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
This original cross-sectional comparative study evaluates pelvic floor morphometry and function in geographically distinct cohorts of healthy young adults, addressing the limited availability of normative data in this age group. We hypothesized that pelvic floor morphometric measurements would differ between cohorts from the United States and the United Arab Emirates, while voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractility would remain comparable after adjustment for anthropometric characteristics.
Study design, materials and methods
A total of 314 healthy nulliparous young adults were recruited from the United States (n = 200) and the United Arab Emirates (n = 114). Pelvic floor assessment was performed using standardized transabdominal ultrasound. Bladder base position was measured at rest and during voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction. Contractility was defined as the displacement difference between resting and contraction measurements. Between-group comparisons were performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests. Analyses of covariance adjusted for age, height, weight, and body mass index.
Results
Participants from the United States demonstrated greater bladder base position at rest compared with the UAE cohort (mean ± SD: 5.25 ± 1.58 vs 4.21 ± 1.68; mean difference 1.04; 24.7% higher; p < 0.001). During voluntary contraction, measurements were also higher in the USA cohort (4.78 ± 1.49 vs 3.79 ± 1.65; mean difference 0.99; 26.1% higher; p < 0.001). However, pelvic floor muscle contractility did not differ significantly between groups (0.47 ± 0.38 vs 0.42 ± 0.26; mean difference 0.05; 11.9% relative difference; p = 0.192). These findings remained consistent after adjustment for anthropometric variables.
Interpretation of results
The observed higher bladder base position at rest and during voluntary contraction in the U.S. cohort suggests potential anatomical or baseline functional differences in pelvic floor support between populations. These differences could reflect variations in lifestyle, habitual activity, or other population-specific factors influencing pelvic floor morphology. Importantly, despite these structural variations, pelvic floor muscle contractility did not differ significantly, indicating that the functional capacity for active pelvic floor elevation is comparable between cohorts. This dissociation between resting anatomy and contractile function highlights that higher baseline bladder position does not necessarily confer greater functional strength. Adjustments for anthropometric variables confirm that these findings are independent of body size, suggesting intrinsic population-level differences rather than differences driven by physique.
Concluding message
Geographically distinct cohorts of healthy young adults demonstrated significant differences in pelvic floor morphometric measurements, while voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractility was comparable after anthropometric adjustment. These findings support the presence of structural variation with preserved functional performance and highlight the importance of population-specific normative reference values in pelvic floor assessment.
Figure 1 Panels A-C: Box plots comparing PF1, PF2, and PF3 resting values between USA and UAE. Yellow diamonds indicate mean values. Panel D: Grouped bar chart of all PF resting values. Panel E: PF active values comparison. Panel F: PF difference values p>0.001
Figure 2 Panel A: BMI vs PF resting (weak positive); B: Age vs PF resting (minimal); C: Weight vs PF resting (positive); D: PF resting vs PF active (strong linear); E: Height vs weight by ethnicity; F: PF resting vs PF difference. Blue = USA, Red = UAE.
References
  1. Loving S, Thomsen T, Jaszczak P, Nordling J. Pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions are prevalent in female chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional population-based study. Eur J Pain. 2014;18:1259–1270.
  2. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141–148.
  3. Khowailed IA, Disney H, Lee H. Gender-specific differences of normative values of pelvic floor muscle function in healthy adult population: an observational analytical study. Women Health. 2020;60:1185–1195.
Disclosures
Funding This research was funded by the University of Sharjah through a Seed Research Grant (Project No. 25010505151), approved by the University Research Board (Ref. V.C.R.G./R. 447/2025). Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Saint of Augustine Health Sciences IRB and Sharjah University (REC- 25-02-13-03-S) conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
11/10/2026 01:55:19