Lumbosacral Plexus Tractography to diagnose pudendal nerve and other intrapelvic entrapment neuropathies

Lemos N1, Fernandes G L2, Melo H J F3, Morgado-Ribeiro A4, Szejnfeld J4, Cancelliere L5, Sermer C5, Li A L K5, Naraghi A5, Atri M5, Girão M J B C4, Goldman S6

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Imaging

Abstract 397
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion ePoster Session 21
Thursday 30th August 2018
13:20 - 13:25 (ePoster Station 9)
Exhibition Hall
Pain, Pelvic/Perineal Neuropathies: Peripheral Urgency/Frequency Urgency, Fecal Pain, other
1. University of Toronto, Canada; Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2. Federal University of Sao Paulo; Faculdade de Ciência Médicas da Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3. Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas da Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4. Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 5. University of Toronto, Canada, 6. Federal University of Sao Paulo
Presenter
N

Nucelio Lemos

Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Pudendal neuralgia is a debilitating condition and an important cause of chronic pelvic and perineal pain. It causes a significant impact on quality of life, psychosocial distress, sexual dysfunction, and problems with partner-relationships. It is also noted to have an increased association with depression, anxiety, and fatigue.  
There is a global demand for accurate diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia. Currently, the diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia is based on the Nantes Diagnostic Criteria, which relies on clinical findings and is not specific, leading to an average time to diagnosis of 4.5 years from the onset of symptoms to definitive treatment.[1] Patients who present with pain – such as tingling, numbness, muscle weakness, genital pain and/or urinary symptoms – because of compressed nerves, are commonly misdiagnosed, leading to misdirected and inefficacious treatments. On average, patients with intrapelvic nerve entrapments undergo 1.2 ineffective surgical procedures, aimed at the wrong cause of pain.[1] Once accurately diagnosed, treatment via laparoscopy has shown to be successful in resolving symptoms and relieving pain.[1,2]
Therefore, diagnosis is the main factor standing between patients and effective treatment.  Tractography is a 3D modeling technique used to visually represent neural tracts using data collected by diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and has already been used to map the lumbosacral plexus.[3] 
We have piloted the use of this technique in patients undergoing pelvic MRI and MR Neurography for the investigation of intrapelvic neuropathy. The objective of this study is to analyze the tractography reconstruction and compare it with neurography and intraoperative findings.
Study design, materials and methods
This is a retrospective tractographic reconstruction of DWI sequences collected from patients who underwent laparoscopic detrapment of the sacral plexus, as previously described.[1] As per since the last quarter of 2015 our standard preoperative workup protocol was established with pelvic MRI with MR Neurography (MRN) and DWI sequences, which are used for anatomical analysis and preoperative planning. 
Axial DWI sequence is performed with diffusion-weighted spin echo single-shot echo planar imaging (EPI) with following parameters: echo time=85 ms, repetition time= 9900 ms, time of acquisition= 7:55, sense factor= 3, field of view= 258 mm, matrix size= 128 x 160,  number of slices= 50, isotropic size = 1.6 x 1.6 x 4.0, b values= 0, 50, 500, 700 ,  gradient directions= 6. Two information generated from the DTI sequence will aid in the study of the lumbosacral plexus: fiber tractography and fractional anisotropy (FA).
These images are used solely for anatomical visualization and preoperative planning, but not for diagnostic purposes. All diagnosis is based on clinical Preoperative Neuropelveological Assessment (PNA) and Urodynamics, as previously described.[1]
In March 2018, all the stored DWI sequences were reprocessed for tractography analysis. All patients had signed a consent authorizing the use of MR and surgical images and clinical data for research, educational and quality improvement purposes.
Data was tabulated and MR Tractography (MRT) results were compared to PNA, MR Neurography (MRN) results and to intraoperative findings. Primary outcome was the correlation between MRT and intraoperative findings. Secondary outcomes were MRN and PNA correlation with intraoperative findings and MRT correlation with clinical outcomes.
Results
A total of 14 patients (11 women, 3 men) were included in this analysis.
Tabulated results are displayed on the table.
Twelve out of 14 MRT reconstructions were considered satisfactory. Two had limited results secondary to artifacts generated by orthopedic hardware. On all twelve cases whose MRT reconstruction was considered technically reliable, diffusion rate and tractographic analyses were capable of identifying the site of entrapment found intraoperatively. Of these, 10 had satisfactory clinical outcomes (>50% symptom reduction on VAS).
PNA diagnosis was correct in 13 out of the 14 cases.
MRN was only altered in one case, which coincidently had a Tarlov cyst.
Interpretation of results
The perfect correlation observed between MRT and intraoperative findings are extremely encouraging. This study, however, has several important limitations: it is a retrospective analysis with MRT interpretation performed in light of intraoperative findings; there is no control group to allow for estimation of positive and negative predictive values.
A pilot prospective blinded case-control study has already been designed to set the basis for a larger trial that will allow for the establishment of sensitivity and specificity of MRT to diagnose pudendal neuralgia and other intrapelvic nerve entrapments. If the results of this larger trial are as good as expected, we might finally have an objective and reliable diagnostic tool, that could potentially reduce the gap between the onset of symptoms and final diagnosis, the number of unnecessary and ineffective surgical procedures, facilitate research by reducing the selection bias and, finally, increase the success rate of treatments for this devastating condition.
MRN sequences played an important role for anatomical localization, but showed no diagnostic value.
Concluding message
Larger controlled trials are still needed, but MRT is a potential candidate for an objective diagnostic tool for pudendal neuralgia and other intrapelvic nerve entrapments. MRN alone has no diagnostic value for intrapelvic nerve entrapments.
Figure 1
Figure 2
References
  1. Lemos N, Papillon-Smith J, Moretti-Marques R, Fernandes G, Girao M, Solnik J. ICS 2017 abstracts: intrapelvic nerve entrapment as a cause of pelvic floor dysfunction and refractory pudendal pain: A review of 50 cases. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2017;36(S3):S575.
  2. Possover M. Laparoscopic management of endopelvic etiologies of pudendal pain in 134 consecutive patients. The Journal of Urology. 2009;181(4):1732-1736. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.096.
  3. van der Jagt PK, Dik P, Froeling M, Kwee TC, Nievelstein RA, ten Haken B, Leemans A. Architectural configuration and microstructural properties of the sacral plexus: a diffusion tensor MRI and fiber tractography study. Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1792-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.001
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd It is a retrospective observational study and all subjects signed a Written informed consent for the proposed procedure and authorization of case data and images for research & educational purposes. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes