Novel imaging techniques reveal disturbed function of prostate ducts by alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockers but not by PDE5-inhibitors in the treatment of BPH

Seidensticker M1, Exintaris B2, Kügler R1, Mietens A1, Tasch S1, Wagenlehner F M3, Risbridger G P4, Middendorff R1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract 94
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 7
Wednesday 29th August 2018
12:40 - 12:45 (ePoster Station 3)
Exhibition Hall
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Imaging Male
1. Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Germany, 2. Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, 3. Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Germany, 4. Prostate and Breast Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Presenter
M

Mathias Seidensticker

Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
We used a novel time-lapse imaging technique in combination with classical morphological studies to visualize and compare the effects of two currently prescribed classes of drugs used for the management of the lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)(PDE5 inhibitors and alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockers) on intact prostatic ducts and seminal vesicles in the rat.
Study design, materials and methods
BPH is characterized by an enlargement of prostate tissue associated with increased smooth muscle tone. One of the most viable treatment option for patients suffering from BPH is tamsulosin, an alpha1-adrenergic receptor blocker used to relax smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) such as sildenafil or tadalafil also relax SMCs and have emerged as alternative treatment options. The prostate consists of single glands which produce the prostatic fluid. Excretory ducts transport the fluid to the urethra during the emission phase of ejaculation. Structural and functional data of glands and ducts as well as information on the response to drugs are sparse.
Results
PDE5 was localized to the SMCs of prostate ducts. Effects of PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil) and alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockers (tamsulosin) on contractile function of the prostate could be directly visualized by time-lapse imaging.
 
Excretory ducts, in contrast to glands, did not contract spontaneously. Imitating the contribution of the prostate to ejaculation by application of noradrenaline, we found that predominantly ductal SMCs ensure expulsion of secretions. Noradrenaline-induced contractions of the isolated duct segments occurred irrespective of pre-treatment with PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil: n=6, p=0.6986 and tadalafil: n=5, p=0.3660). In both cases, the effect of noradrenaline was the same. Pre-treatment with tamsulosin, however, showed a significant reduction (n=6, p= 0.0019) of noradrenaline-induced contractions of the duct. Comparable results were obtained for seminal vesicles. Contractions (n=7, p=0,4338) and weight changes (n=7, p=0,1094) showed that PDE5 inhibitors did not interfere in the expulsion of secrete compared to control while pre-treatment with tamsulosin resulted in an absence of contractions (n=6, p=0,0082) and therefore of secretion and weight changes compared to control (n=6, p=0,0014).
Interpretation of results
Mechanistic data to support the use of PDE5 inhibitors in clinical practice for the treatment of BPH is sparse. We have demonstrated that the use of PDE5 inhibitors do not interfere with the emission phase of ejaculation in the observed tissues but alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockers do. Another tissue involved in the emission phase of ejaculation, the caudal part of the epididymis, which stores the matured sperm, is yet to be investigated.
This data perhaps explains why alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockers differ to PDE5 inhibitors by disturbing prostate and seminal vesicle secretion during the emission phase of ejaculation while still both relax SMC’s.
Concluding message
Data suggest that PDE5 inhibitors do not disturb expulsion of prostate and seminal vesicle secretions during ejaculation and contribute to explain adverse effects on ejaculation observed with alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockers.
References
  1. Kügler R*, Mietens A*, Seidensticker M*, Tasch S, Wagenlehner FM, Kaschtanow A, Tjahjono Y, Tomczyk CU, Beyer D, Risbridger GP, Exintaris B, Ellem SJ, Middendorff R: Novel imaging of the prostate reveals spontaneous gland contraction and excretory duct quiescence together with different drug effects, FASEB J. 2017 Oct 31doi: 10.1096/fj.201700430R, *equal contribution
Disclosures
Funding Part of a DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft) funded project: International Research Training Group (IRTG) Clinical Trial No Subjects Animal Species Rat Ethics Committee JLU no. 469_M and 510_M
27/04/2024 03:45:28