Hypothesis / aims of study
The multi-disciplinary team (MDT) approach is an increasingly familiar aspect across many different surgical specialties. The most recent National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on “The Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women” in 2015 (1) recommend that invasive therapy is offered for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and/or overactive bladder (OAB) only after MDT review. They also recommend that such teams should include representation from: urogynaecology, urology, physiotherapy, colorectal surgery, and geriatrics. The MDT should be working within an established regional clinical network.
In this study, we aim to audit the evolution and activity of the monthly Pelvic Floor MDT of a regional referral centre in North West England. It was initially set up as a small “urodynamic meeting” in 2009 and has grown into its current form today. More specifically, we aimed to identify the patient case load as well as their outcomes following MDT review.
Study design, materials and methods
We retrospectively sampled patients discussed at the local Pelvic Floor MDT from October 2014 to October 2018 which consisted of patients from 3 different sites. We retrospectively analysed paper and electronic documentation as per our aims. Advantis Clinical Documentation System (CDS) was the primary source of data as well as MDT attendance sheets.
Interpretation of results
We have demonstrated the pelvic floor MDT’s progressive evolution since its inception in 2009 (only 21 patients discussed that 12-month period). A wide range of pathology was discussed with referrals from many different specialties although the highest were from gynaecology. The vast majority of patients discussed were middle aged women. The MDT forum promotes cross-speciality discussion in order to ensure best practice for complex incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and rarer pelvic floor pathology. Attendance did not meet NICE guidelines with respect to colorectal surgeons and geriatricians. However, although colorectal surgery is very relevant for pelvic organ prolapse management, the value added to discussions purely regarding incontinence, for example is limited. Both surgical and conservative measures were advocated by the MDT and over a fifth of management plans had changed after MDT review.