Patient characteristics:
Men’s age ranged from 44 to 78, mean age was 67.3. Their body mass indices ranged from 20 to 38.6, with mean BMI 28.09. At 6 weeks post operative 52 patients (28.4%) were completely continent, using no pads. On the otherside 32 patients (17.4%) used more than 3 pads per day. Inbetween there were 94 patients (51%) that used from 1 to 3 pads per day. Fourty four patients (24%) used 1 pad, 28 patients (15.3%) used 2 pads, 22 patients (12%) used 3 pads. At 12 months post operative 114 patients (62.3%) were completely continent, using no pads. On the otherside 17 patients (9.3%) used more than 3 pads per day. Inbetween there were 46 patients (25.1%) that used from 1 to 3 pads per day. Thirt two patients (17.5%) used 1 pad, 5 patients (2.7%) used 2 pads, 9 patients (4.9%) used 3 pads.
Only 11 patients (6%) have received salvage radiotherapy. Eight patients had previous pelvic surgery in the form of hernia repair, TURP, or colorectal surgery.
Surgery characteristics:
Prostatectomies were done by 3 expert surgeons at our institute. One hundred thirty one prostatectomies (71.6%) were done by nerve sparing technique, while 50 prostatectomies (27.3%) were done by non nerve sparing technique. Apart from urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, leakage from urethrovesical anastomosis, 15 patients had postoperative complications.
Cystograms:
All patients had a cystogram at 2 weeks post-operative before twoc. Twenty seven patients (14.8%) had leakage on cystogram. Leakage from both sides, right side alone, left side alone, right posterolateral, left posterolateral, anterior, posterior was shown in 7, 3, 5, 5, 4, 1, 2 cases respectively.
Tumour characteristics:
According to histopathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimen, 92 specimens (51%) showed T2 disease, while 68 specimens (38%) showed T3a disease, 20 specimens showed (11%) T3b disease, and only 1 specimen (0%) showed T4 disease. Regarding gleason score, 140 patients (76.5%)were gleason 7, then 24 patients(13.1%) were gleason 6, 14 patients (7.7%) were gleason 8, 5 patients (2.7%) were gleason 9.
Correlation between urinary incontinence and leakage through urethrovesical anatomsis, and other parameters:
When comparing between group of no leakage and group who had leakage on cystogram, with respect to age and BMI, no statistical significance was found.
When comparing between group of no leakage and group who had leakage on cystogram, with respect to number of pads used at 6 weeks and 12 months, no statistical significance was found.
When comparing between group of no leakage and group who had leakage on cystogram, with respect to surgical technique (whether nerve sparing or non nerve sparing), previous pelvic surgery, post operative complications (other than incontinence, leakage, and impotence), salvage radiotherapy, no statistical significance was found.
When comparing between group of no leakage and group who had leakage on cystogram, with respect to Gleason score and T stage of prostate cancers, no statistical significance was found.
When comparing between group of no leakage and group who had leakage on cystogram, with respect to ICIQ-UI-SF and EPIC26 at early(<3months) and late (>6months) follow up, no statistical significance was found.
No statistically significant correlation was found between ICIQ-UI-SF and EPIC26 at early(<3months) and late (>6months) follow up from one side and the other parameters (Age, BMI, Tstage, Radiotherapy, Surgical technique, previous pelvic surgery, post-operative complications) from the other side.