The Impact of Mid-urethral Sling Surgery on Female Sexual Function in Stress Urinary Incontinence Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized and Non-randomized Studies

Lai S1, Diao T1, Zhang Z1, Seery S2, Wang J1, Zhang Y1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences

Abstract 18
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 2
On-Demand
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Sexual Dysfunction Prospective Study Surgery
1. Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital; National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China, 2. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
Presenter
S

Shicong Lai

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Though mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgeries are recommend as the gold standard therapy of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the impact of MUS operations on female sexual function remains controversial. Consequently, we sought to provide high-quality evidence around the impact of MUS treatments on sexual function for female patients with SUI.
Study design, materials and methods
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies which assessed the impact of MUS treatments on sexual function in sexually active women with SUI. The MUS techniques including retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (outside-in, TOT; inside-out, TVT-O) and single-incision mini-sling (SIMS). All studies included were prospective randomized or non-randomized trials which assessed patients with two validated questionnaires i.e., the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)[1, 2]. Pre- and postoperative data pertaining to sexual functions were extracted. Comparable data were meta-analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software.
Results
Of the 24 studies identified, 17 utilized FSFI and seven adopted PISQ-12 to assess sexual functions. Of the 2188 patients involved, 50.55% (n = 1106) underwent transobturator approach MUS (i.e., TOT, TVT-O and Monarc), 28.06% (n = 614) retropubic route MUS (i.e., TVT), and 9.87% (n = 216) SIMS (i.e., Ajust®, MiniArc® and TVT Secur System®), while the remaining 11.52% (n = 252) were reported without clearly defined techniques and were therefore broadly categorized as ‘other MUS’. 
Pooled analysis indicates that 6-month postoperative PISQ-12 total scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores (Weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.31 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.32 to -1.30, p=0.001; Fig.1A). Additionally, similar results were found at the 12-month juncture (WMD -3.30 points, 95% CI -6.01 to -0.58, p=0.02; Fig.1B) and 24-month follow-up point (WMD -4.44 points, 95% CI -5.45 to -3.44, p<0.00001; Fig.1C). Unfortunately, follow-up data from 4 to 15 years were insufficient for meta-analysis of the longer term effects. Although, findings do suggest that women’s postoperative sexual functioning is at least not inferior to preoperative sexual functions.
Consistently, pooled postoperative FSFI total scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores at 6-months (WMD -2.22 points, 95% CI -3.36 to -1.08, p=0.00001; Fig.2A) and 12-months (WMD -3.49 points, 95% CI -5.96 to -1.02, p=0.006; Fig.2B). Postoperative FSFI sub-scores at 6-months and 12-months suggest that desire, arousal, orgasm, lubrication, satisfaction and pain during sexual intercourse were also significantly higher than baseline scores (all p<0.05).
Interpretation of results
To the best of our knowledge, both the PISQ-12 and FSFI are internationally validated questionnaires and are recommended by the International Continence Society to assess sexual functions. Findings from this meta-analysis add to the evidence base demonstrating that sexually active women with SUI can experience an improved sex life after MUS treatment. The primary reason for this improvement may be the absence of incontinence and decreased negative emotional responses during intercourse[3]. Critically speaking, even though the PISQ-12 or FSFI are validated and can provide insight into sexual functioning, these questionnaires are subjective measures which may not have the capacity to explore the nuances of personal experience or concept of self. Therefore, these findings also suggest there may be a need for more unstructured qualitative research to explore the complexity of personal perceptions involved sexual desirability and comfort during, and after intercourse.
Concluding message
MUS treatments appear to improve sexual function for women with SUI. However, these findings should be further confirmed through well-designed prospective randomized controlled trial with larger samples and it may prove worthwhile intercalating more qualitative research into personal perceptions of stigma related to SUI and sexual performance.
Figure 1 Figure 1. Impact of MUS surgeries on sexual function assessed using PISQ-12: (A) meta-analysis of pre- and postoperative scores at 6 months, (B) 12 months, and (C) 24 months.
Figure 2 Figure 2. Impact of MUS surgeries on sexual function assessed using FSFI: (A) meta-analysis of the pre- and postoperative scores at 6 months, and (B) 12 months.
References
  1. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000. 26(2): 191-208.
  2. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003. 14(3): 164-8; discussion 168.
  3. Glavind K, Larsen T, Lindquist AS. Sexual function in women before and after tension-free vaginal tape operation for stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014. 93(10): 986-90.
Disclosures
Funding National Key R&D Program of China Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis.All data were carefully extracted from existing literature, and this article did not involve handling of individual patient data. In addition, all of the included studies mentioned the Approval of Institutional Review Board. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No
22/04/2024 05:17:58