Hypothesis / aims of study
Genito-urinary fistulae (GUF) are relatively uncommon in the developed world and are more commonly associated with an iatrogenic aetiology. Much of our knowledge on the surgical treatment of this problem is borne out of individual case series, with very few publications that involve high patient numbers. In the UK genito-urinary fistuale are increasingly being treated in tertiary centres with higher volumes of cases. We report on the outcomes of genito-urinary fistula repair in a single high-volume regional referral centre.
Study design, materials and methods
We performed a retrospective review of patient records, operation notes and radiology results of all female patients who underwent GUF repair in our unit over a 15 year period. Preoperative data included fistula aetiology, time-to-surgery and number of previous attempts at repair. Repairs were performed using a trans-abdominal approach for fistulae that were large, located towards the dome of the bladder or involved either the ureter(s) or uterus. Repair was performed using non-overlapping suture lines and tissue interpositioning was achieved using the omentum where available, peritoneum or a Martius fat pad during a trans-vaginal repair. Catheter removal was performed following an absence of contrast extravasation during a cystogram at the 2nd post-operative week. Outcome assessments include complications, anatomical closure rates, and continence rates.
Interpretation of results
In our centre the success rate of surgical repair of genito-urinary fistula repair was 98.9%, even in cases of complex or re-do repair. There were two recurrences of fistulae after two years.