Hypothesis / aims of study
Limited high quality data exists on the risks of complications associated with suprapubic catheter (SPC) insertion. Bowel injury (BI) is a well-recognised albeit uncommon complication. UK Guidelines on the insertion of SPC have been developed by the Birtish Association of Urolgical Surgeons (BAUS), but there remains little evidence regarding the incidence of this complication.
This study uses contemporary UK data to assess the incidence of SPC insertion and the rate of bowel injury. We also perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of available research worldwide on BI rates from SPC insertion.
Study design, materials and methods
National Hospital Episodes Statistics data was searched on all SPC insertions in the UK over an 18 month period for OPCS Code M38.2 (Cystostomy and insertion of suprapubic tube into bladder). Patients age, 30 day readmission rates, 30 day mortality rate and catheter specific complication rate were collected. Cause of death was not collected.
To estimate bowel injury rate, we searched patients who had undergone any laparotomy or bowel operation within 30 days of SPC insertion. Trusts were contacted directly and directed to ascertain whether there was SPC related bowel injury.
PubMed search to identify papers reporting on SPC related bowel injury was performed for meta-analysis. We excluded expert opinion, case studues, individual reviews and oncluded only those that reported bowel injury rate.
Interpretation of results
This is the largest data set reported on SPC insertions showing a lower than previously reported rate of bowel injury from SPC insertion.
We acknowledge limitations to this study. Data are missing for 27 of the 142 laparotomies performed, and the rate of bowel injury may therefore be understimated. However, even if it was assumed that all these cases had a BI (which is unlikely) the BI rate would still be in line with recent studies at 0.24% (28/11,473).