Association between gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-specific urinary incontinence: Severity and impact on the quality of life over the first year postpartum

Rudge M1, Piculo F1, Marini G1, Vesentini V1, Prudencio C1, Hallur R1, Barbosa B2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences

Abstract 601
Quality of Life and Health Delivery
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 39
On-Demand
Quality of Life (QoL) Incontinence Female Prospective Study
1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, 2. Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Philosophy and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Marilia, São Paulo State, Brazil
Presenter
M

Marilza VC Rudge

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
In the light of the complex inter-relationships among diabetes mellitus, pregnancy and urinary incontinence, the hypothesis was that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) associated with pregnancy-specific urinary incontinence (PS-UI) will increase the occurrence and severity of UI, having a negative impact on the QoL during pregnancy and up to 12 months postpartum. The aim of this study was to investigate the severity and impact of UI on quality of life (QoL) of diabetic pregnant women over a 1-year follow-up period.
Study design, materials and methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in a Perinatal Diabetes Research Center and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institution. Three hundred eighty-eight women were evaluated at five-time-points: 24-28 gestational weeks (visit 1), 34-38 gestational weeks (visit 2), 24-48 hours postpartum (visit 3), 6 weeks postpartum (visit 4) and 6-12 months postpartum (visit 5). The diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) was established between 24th and 28th gestational weeks, by the 75 g-OGTT test according to ADA’s criteria (1). Urinary incontinence was defined according to the International Continence Society (2) and the severity and impact on QoL were evaluated by ISI (Urinary Incontinence Severity Index) and ICIQ-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form). From the data, the pregnant women were classified into two study groups: normoglycemic incontinent (NI; normal 75-g GTT; n=168) and diabetic incontinent (DI; abnormal 75-g GTT; n=220). The NI and DI groups were compared using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student-t test for quantitative variables. All analyses were performed using SAS software for Windows, v.9.3.
Results
The figure 1 indicates the incontinence data and questionnaire response and the figure 2 shows the classification of UI severity and its impact on the quality of life.
Interpretation of results
The responses to the ISI and ICIQ-SF questionnaires showed greater severity combined with greater bother-score in diabetic women, with severe and very severe classification, compared to normoglycemic women in all time-points. The third item of the ICIQ-SF (Impact of UI on QoL) also demonstrated higher levels of interference on daily life in diabetic women, both during pregnancy and after delivery, except at 6 weeks postpartum (P=0.1105).
Concluding message
Diabetic pregnant women tended to exhibit more severe symptoms of PS-UI as well as the worse impact on QoL during pregnancy with an excessive tendency to show a similar reaction over the first year postpartum. These study not only contradicts the old concept that the effects of GDM vanish soon after delivery but also reinforce the positive interaction between pregnancy, GDM and long-term maternal outcome.
Figure 1 ISI, ICIQ-SF and QoL response scores
Figure 2 The proportions of slight, moderate, severe and very severe symptoms evaluated using the ISI (A) and ICIQ-SF (B) questionnaires among incontinent women with gestational hyperglycemia and normoglycemia. Wks, weeks; h, hours; P, pregnancy; PP, postpartum.
References
  1. American Diabetes Association (ADA). Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:S81–90.
  2. Abrams, P.; Andersson, K.E.; Birder, L.; Brubaker, L.; Cardozo, L.; Chapple, C.; Drake, M. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2010, 29, 213–240.
  3. Rudge MVC, Souza FP, Abbade JF, Hallur RLS, Marcondes JPC, Piculo F, Marini G, Vesentini G, Thabane L, Witkin SS, Calderon IMP, Barbosa AMP, The Diamater Study Group. Study protocol to investigate biomolecular muscle profile as predictors of long-term urinary incontinence in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1): 117. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2749-x.
Disclosures
Funding This work was supported by grant #2012/25060-3 and #2016/01743-5, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee This is a cross-sectional study with the approval of the Research Ethics Committee of Botucatu Medical School - UNESP (CAAE20639813.0.0000.5411) Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
17/04/2024 08:17:00