Women’s Lived Experience of Complete Mid-urethral Sling Removal: A Qualitative Study

Tanaka D1, Jennifer W2, Marcus C1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Abstract 209
On Demand Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Scientific Open Discussion Session 18
On-Demand
Grafts: Synthetic Incontinence Quality of Life (QoL) Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery
1. The Royal Women's Hospital and Epworth HealthCare, 2. The University of Melbourne
Presenter
D

Dune Tanaka

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
To explore women’s experience of complete mid-urethral mesh sling (MUS) removal.
Study design, materials and methods
Consecutive women who underwent complete MUS removal from 2014 to 2018 were invited to participate in this IRB-approved study. Retropubic, trans-obturator and single-incision slings were included. Underpinned by phenomenological methods, semi-structured in-depth interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using van Manen’s (1997) 6-step approach to hermeneutic phenomenology (1). Participants’ narratives were explored using van Manen’s (2014) four existentials (life world): lived body, lived relation, lived space and lived time (2). Participants had the option of reading their transcripts to ensure their lived experiences were accurately captured.
Results
Twenty-two Caucasian women with a median age of 54 years (37-75) and parity 3 (1-5) were approached to participate in this study with 13 completing the interviews. Data saturation was successfully achieved. Complete MUS removal was achieved in all cases. Surgical approach depended on the type of MUS and included: combined vaginal and groin; vaginal, combined laparoscopic and vaginal; combined robotic and vaginal in 12, 5, 4 and 2 cases respectively (2 participants had multiple slings removed). Women’s experiences were encapsulated by ‘It’s all in my head’ and shared stories of undergoing a perceivably low risk ‘simple 20-minute procedure’ and of not being believed when they reported that something was wrong after surgery. Fourteen themes, detailed in Figure 1, emerged across van Manen’s four existentials (1).  Following MUS removal, life for most women was slowly returning to a sense of normality, although many reported ongoing symptoms including urinary incontinence and pain. Eight (36%) have required further non-mesh continence surgery. All women clearly expressed complete MUS mesh removal was the correct decision for them, where one woman shared: ‘Life is a hell of a lot better without it’ [the mesh]. Participants highlighted the lack of integrated care to deal with complications arising from MUS sling surgery.
Interpretation of results
The women’s lived experience began with a true clinical problem, stress incontinence, which was supposed to be “easily” fixed with a simple day surgery procedure. Unfortunately, these women experienced significant and major complications from surgery leading to pain, aggravation, regret and a sense that what they experienced was all in their heads. Ultimately, all the women felt much better upon total mesh removal coupled with a sense that life could finally move forward.
Concluding message
Qualitative research methodology provided important insights into the lived experiences of women who requested and underwent complete MUS removal. Participants consistently reported a general dismissal of their symptoms, loss of trust in the medical profession and vindication of their decision to undergo complete MUS removal. Women who present with debilitating MUS-related complications should receive empathetic optimal care and ongoing support. A woman’s decision to undergo complete MUS removal should be respected and performed by surgeons with experience in complete MUS removal.
Figure 1 Emergent Themes of the Lived Experience
References
  1. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Ontario: Althouse Press.
  2. van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Disclosures
Funding Epworth Medical Foundation Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee The Royal Women's Hospital and Governance at Epworth HealthCare Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
27/03/2024 19:07:52