Hypothesis / aims of study
Population ageing has as consequence an increasing number of women older than 80 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who are referred for urodynamics to diagnose the cause of LUTS and to propose management.
It is frequent that elderly people have a wide range of chronic conditions. Consequently they tend to take multiple medications in a day, including frequently one or more anticholinergic drugs (AC) resulting in cumulative anticholinergic burden (AB). AC (before availability of beta-3 agonist) were the first line treatment for overactive bladder. Main effect is to inhibit uninhibited detrusor contractions; adverse effects are urinary frequency, urgency with or without incontinence.
Aims of study were for the first time to search for the incidence of AB on urodynamic study for non-neurologic women older than 80 years.
Study design, materials and methods
Urodynamic tracings of 117 non-neurologic women older than 80 years who were referred for investigation of various LUTS were retrospectively analyzed.
Each file comprised demographic data, medical history, bladder diary for three days and medications. Exclusion criteria were advanced cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 20), diabetes mellitus and/or severe mobility impairment.
Main complaint was assessed through history taking and defined as: stress urinary incontinence (SUI), mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and OTHER (no urinary incontinence).
AB was estimated using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale [1].
After urodynamic session, a urodynamic diagnosis (UD) was posed according to the ICS/IUGA recommendations. UD were detrusor overactivity with impaired contractility (DHIC), detrusor overactivity (DO), detrusor underactivity (DU), low bladder compliance (LBC). Some investigations were found “normal” (N) and other related to urethral dysfunction (intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD)). Some combined diagnoses were observed between DO, DU or DHIC with ISD.
As AC drugs modify detrusor contraction, an evaluation of detrusor contractility (parameter VBN k) was made using the VBN model [2-3] in order to analyze the effect of AB on that population. Parameters allowing k computation are initial bladder volume (Vini) with a voided volume >100 mL, maximum flow Qmax and detrusor pressure at maximum flow pdet.Qmax [3]. Thus files with an IF will be more accurately analyzed.
Interpretation of results
.The role of AC is to decrease detrusor contractility, so an expected observation is a predominance of symptomatology which could be a consequence of AC treatment.
In that population of older non neurologic women predominance of MUI, UUI and frequency-dysuria (88.5% in X and 95% in Y of patients included in OTHER) could be the consequence of treatment of some existing LUTS by AC. High AB is observed in women with MUI and UUI complaints.
The high AB value for patients with SUI complaint results from a patient’s AB who had former AC treatment of detrusor overactivity; that women had still a high detrusor contractility (k = .340) while absence of non inhibited detrusor contraction during urodynamics.
Despite a small population, some trends can be proposed.
Looking at urodynamic diagnosis there is no significant difference in AB between UD with a trend to lower values for UD of DO-ISD and N. An intriguing result is the high AB for women with ISD diagnosis which is the consequence as for SUI complaint of a former treatment for three women of detrusor overactivity.
The last question is: is there a decrease of detrusor contractility associated with AB? The values of the VBN parameter of detrusor contractility are low which could also be explained by an important decrease in detrusor contractility with aging but k values are consistent with previous evaluation in a population older than 60 years without reference of AB [3].