Long-term evaluation of the adjustable bulbourethral Argus® sling: Single center experience with a mean follow-up of 10 years

Ameli G1, Weil P1, Pureger L1, Vendl J1, Rutkowski M1, Huebner W1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Male Stress Urinary Incontinence (Post Prostatectomy Incontinence)

Abstract 305
On Demand Male Stress Urinary Incontinence (Post Prostatectomy Incontinence)
Scientific Open Discussion Session 23
On-Demand
Incontinence Male Surgery Stress Urinary Incontinence
1. Department of Urology, Clinic of Korneuburg, Austria
Presenter
G

Ghazal Ameli

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
The use of adjustable bulbourethral male slings may be a promising alternative for the treatment of post-operative stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We report on our long-term experience regarding efficacy, safety and satisfaction in recipients of the Argus® sling.
Study design, materials and methods
In this retrospective, single center study conducted between March 2005 and September 2020, the data from 122 men with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence, who underwent male Argus® sling implantation were collected. 24 patients (19,7%) had one and 20(16,4%) more than one previous incontinence surgeries, 25 patients had undergone previous external beam radiation (20,5%). 
Preoperative evaluation included urine culture, urethrocystoscopy, 24-h pad test (p/d). Postoperative evaluation included residual volume, VAS-scale and p/d, we also used a questionnaire to inquire about recipient’s satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Continence was defined ≤1 pad per day (socially dry). Complications were graded using Clavien-Dindo scale.
Results
115 patients (7 were lost to follow-up) were followed for a mean follow-up (FU) of 95 (±60) months (median 97). 75 (65,2%) were socially dry and a reduction of more than 50% in p/d was obtained in additional 11,3%. Adjustment was necessary in 53 cases (46,1%), either tightening (n=52) or loosening and the satisfaction rate was 96%.
Within the whole series 12 interoperative bladder perforations occurred (9,8%). In all cases, the needle was simply repositioned, and the catheter left in situ for 5 days. 
Complications included postoperative hematoma (n=12) and transient perineal or scrotal pain (n=11). Sling explantation was reported in 39 patients after a median of 40.7 months, mostly associated with persistence urinary incontinence (n=16) or urethral erosion (n=10). Other reasons for explantation were infection (n=6), subcutaneous dislocalisation of silicone columns (n=6) and 1 case of severe and prolonged pain. Explantation was reported in 17 cases within the first 3 years, another 22 slings were explanted after 3 to 13 years of sufficient function (median 6). In all 33 of these patients received later successful treatments for urinary incontinence (30 artificial urinary sphincter, 3 re-implantation of the sling).
Interpretation of results
The treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with ARGUS Sling provides high satisfaction rate and an improvement of pad per day usage over 50%, in 77% was reported in this cohort. With an acceptable complication rate and the option of minimal invasive adjustment to patient needs, the dives is a safe and efficient treatment for SUI.
Concluding message
The Argus® sling is an effective treatment option to achieve substantial long-term improvement of incontinence in patient with moderate-to-severe SUI.
Disclosures
Funding none Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Ethic committee of Lower Austria Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No
12/05/2024 01:58:59