Study design, materials and methods
Female physicians across the nation were asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing urinary habits at work, and were asked to fill out the Urogenital Distress Inventory- 6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire- 7. For the power analysis, the prevalence of UI was estimated to be 25% based on prior studies; this rate has not changed significantly over time [1]. To detect a 10% increased rate of UI in physicians, 156 participants would be needed to achieve a power of 80% and alpha of 0.05. Chi square test was used to compare the rate of UI to the general population. Crosstab tables were created to show the prevalence of UI, stress UI (SUI), urgency UI (UUI), and mixed UI (MUI) within age groups compared to the general population. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the association between UI and work related variables (surgical vs non-surgical specialty, work week length, time between voids, and delay in voiding).
Interpretation of results
The participants in this study were overall healthy with no comorbidities, nulliparous (65.5%), and pre-menopausal (96.4%). Despite this, there was a higher prevalence of UI in this cohort compared to the general population. In addition, participants in the 25-29 age group had higher rates of UI overall (47.3%), SUI (25.5%) and UUI (10.9 %). The majority of physicians sampled reported decreased frequency of voiding as a result of their work schedule and most reported intake of 1 or more bladder irritates. It is possible these factors contributed to an early onset of UI in this population.