Hypothesis / aims of study
We aimed to describe the presentation, investigations, and management of patients with urethral diverticula and to review the importance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and surgical management of urethral diverticula.
Study design, materials and methods
This was a retrospective study of female patients who underwent urethral diverticulectomy between 2010 and 2018 by a single surgeon with subspecialty training in functional and reconstructive urology. This study was approved by the Research Ethics review board. Clinical data was collected on patient demographics, presenting symptoms, investigations performed, operative technique, and minimum of two-year follow-up. A 2 Tesla MRI pelvis with T1 fat suppressed sequence and T2 void phase was performed for all patients and reviewed by experienced uroradiologists.
Interpretation of results
Urethral diverticula are an uncommon urological pathology and diagnosis can be challenging. The most common presentation of our patients was with a either a palpable vaginal lump, LUTS, or recurrent UTIs. We did not find the classically described “3 Ds” of dysuria, dyspareunia and post-void dribbling associated with urethral diverticula to be applicable.[1] Imaging modalities such as double-balloon test, voiding cystourethrograms and ultrasound and as well as endoscopic investigation have been superseded by MRI. It has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of urethral diverticulum and exclude other causes of vaginal lumps. In our case series it was superior to endoscopy in locating the ostium and demonstrated a high degree of concordance with operative findings.