Twenty-seven patients (n=16 women, 59% and n=11 men, 41) were included in the final analysis as they had complete data. The mean patient age was 59.59±15.55 years. Radiologically, 44% (n=12) of the patients had one affected level, 37% (n=10) had two affected levels, 15% (n=4) had three affected levels and 4% (n=1) had four affected levels. The majority of patients (n=17, 63%) were submitted to a combination of microdiscectomy, hemilaminectomy and instrumentation, followed by 30 (n=8) who had been submitted to microdiscectomy and hemilaminectomy, while the remaining 7% (n=2) had been submitted to microdiscectomy alone. The most common neurological symptoms and signs are presented in Table 1.
Urologically, the majority of patients (n=12, 44%) were started on clean intermittent catheterizations (CIC), while another 4 (15%) were on indwelling catheter, 3 patients (11%) were on an alpha-blocker, 4 patients were on antimuscarinics, one patient on combination of an alpha-blocker with an antimuscarinic and CIC, and only 3 patients (11%) could freely void without any intervention. The vast majority of patients (92%, n=25) suffered from LUT dysfunction, urinary retention being the most prevalent symptom (48.1%, n=13) followed by abdominal straining to void (37%, n=10), while urodynamic investigation most commonly demonstrated detrusor underactivity (77%, n=21) followed by detrusor overactivity (33.3%, n=9). The presence of detrusor underactivity (DU) was related to the number of affected levels (p<0.05, x2(3) =8.196). Detrusor overactivity was more commonly present in patients with delayed procedures (p<0.05, U=41.0, z=-2.08). By contrast, early procedures were associated with abdominal straining (p<0.05, U=44.0, z=-2.09). In terms of neurological signs, perianal hypo-aesthesia was the single symptom which precipitated the decision for surgery (p<0.05, U=38, z=-2.5), while paresis and rhizalgia were major indications but did not reach statistical significance. Finally, the number of affected levels was not associated with CES and the type of urological management was not related to the type of neurosurgical procedure.