Robotic artificial urinary sphincter explantation and concomitant fascial sing insertion in case of bladder neck cuff extrusion for female patients

Haudebert C1, Richard C1, Hascoet J1, Freton L1, Manunta A1, Brucker B2, Peyronnet B1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Abstract 594
Robotic Bladder Neck, Artificial Urinary Sphincter, Reconstructive, Pediatric and Tapes
Scientific Podium Video Session 36
Saturday 10th September 2022
15:23 - 15:32
Hall K2
Stress Urinary Incontinence Female Fistulas
1. CHU de Rennes, 2. University of New York
Online
Presenter
C

Camille Haudebert

Links

Abstract

Introduction
Female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is highly prevalent. Artificial urinary sphincter is an option for severe or complex female SUI cases. In case of bladder neck cuff extrusion, AUS explantation is required and further SUI treatment (AUS reimplantation or others) can be challenging. In the present video, we report and describe a new surgical technique aiming both to treat AUS bladder neck extrusion and to prevent recurrence of SUI.
Design
We present the case of a 43-year-old female patient with a history of urethrovaginal fistula after the excision of a paraurethral leiomyoma. After   urethrovaginal fistula repair with a Martius flap interposition she reported severe SUI. After failure of two TVT slings, she still reported SUI with 350 g on 24h pad weigh test, massive leakage on cough stress test with a fixed urethra. She underwent robotic AUS implantation with complete resolution of SUI postoperatively. Six months after the implantation, she presented a recurrence of the SUI and urethral pain. Bladder neck extrusion of the AUS cuff was diagnosed on flexible cystoscopy. A robotic AUS explantation was planned. We offered to place a fascial sling at the bladder neck during the explantation to minimize the risk of SUI and urethrovaginal fistula recurrence
Results
Five ports are placed. The Da Vinci Xi robot is docked on the left side of the patient (side docking).   The bladder is dropped down from the abdominal wall. The AUS pressure regulating balloon is found, dissected and explanted.  Opening the fibrotic tissue surrounding the bladder neck, the cuff is found, dissected and opened. 
The anterior aspect of the bladder is opened longitudinally to repair the bladder neck defect transvesically. The edges of the bladder incision are sutured on each side to the abdominal wall to improve the transvesical bladder neck exposure. The inflammatory/necrotic tissues surrounding the extrusion orifice are excised. The orifice is then closed transversally (to avoid bladderneck stenosis) in two layers (detrusor and mucosa individually) using interrupted 4/0 Vicryl sutures
To harvest rectus fascia sling, a 7 cm suprapubic incision is made and carried down to the rectus fascia. A 10x1.5 cm rectus fascial sling is harvested. The fascia is then closed using two running sutures. The fascial sling is inserted through the 12 mm assistant port and placed around the bladder neck in the dissected space of the explanted AUS cuff. 
The sling is pulled towards the rectus fascia using two permanent 2/0 monofilament stitches inserted into the abdomen with a Reverdun needle and placed at each end of the sling. We tightened the sling above the rectus fascia moderately on the assistant finger 
The bladder and all the cutaneous incision are closed. 

The operative time was 280 minutes with minimal blood loss. There was no postoperative complications. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. The urethral catheter was removed at day 15 and the patient resumed spontaneous voiding with post-void residual of 70 ml. At 1 month, she is socially continent, wearing 1 pad per day.
Conclusion
Robotic artificial urinary sphincter explantation and concomitant fascial sing insertion in case of bladder neck cuff extrusion appears feasible and may be an interesting salvage option to prevent SUI recurrence and avoid further anti-incontinence surgical procedures likely to be highly challenging.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd Retrospective Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No
Citation

Continence 2S2 (2022) 100483
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2022.100483

17/04/2024 12:25:46