ACUTE EFFECT OF HEAVY WEIGHTLIFTING ON THE PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLES – AN EXPERIMENTAL CROSSOVER STUDY

Skaug K1, Engh M2, Bø K1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Video coming soon!

Watch this session

Abstract 282
Pelvic Floor Muscle Function, Dysfunction and Morphology
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 34
Friday 29th September 2023
14:52 - 15:00
Room 104AB
Female Pelvic Floor Stress Urinary Incontinence
1. Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway, 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog
Presenter
K

Kari Bø

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Heavy lifting may produce strain on the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) due to high increases in intraabdominal pressure (1), but knowledge of impact of weightlifting on the PFM is lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate acute effects of heavy weightlifting on the PFM in strength-trained women and whether general strength in whole-body exercises were correlated with PFM strength.
Study design, materials and methods
Nulliparous women between 18-35 years who regularly performed weightlifting and were able to lift their own bodyweight x 1.2 in squat and 1.5 in deadlift were included in this experimental crossover study. They participated in baseline evaluations (questionnaire/measurements of background characteristics and urinary incontinence, 1 repetition maximum (1RM) tests in squat and deadlift) and one test day where they were randomized to start with 60 minutes weightlifting (4 sets of 4 repetitions at 75-85% of 1RM in squat and deadlift) or seated rest of 60 minutes. Vaginal pressure measurements of PFM resting pressure, strength and endurance (Figure 1) and sEMG-measurements of PFM resting activity were performed before/after weightlifting and rest. ICIQ-UI-SF were used to assess prevalence of urinary incontinence (2).
Results
Fifteen powerlifters, 14 CrossFit exercisers, 14 recreational exercisers and 4 Olympic weightlifters were included (N=47). Twenty-two (46,8%) reported any type of urinary incontinence. The most common type was stress urinary incontinence, reported by 19 (40,4%). Only 3 of the participants reported minor urinary leakage during the training session. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the change in PFM resting pressure, strength, endurance and resting activity after heavy weightlifting and rest (Table 1). There were no statistically significant correlations between PFM strength and maximum (1RM) or relative strength (1RM/bodyweight) in neither squat nor deadlift.
Interpretation of results
Our results imply that heavy weightlifting of whole-body exercises is well tolerated by the PFM in healthy, nulliparous women with experience in strength training. Since pelvic floor dysfunction is common among female powerlifters and Olympic weightlifters (3), long term effects of heavy weightlifting and lifting above 85% of 1RM should be further investigated. Our sample included healthy, nulliparous women with no or mild pelvic floor dysfunctions. Studies comparing effects of heavy lifting on the pelvic floor in women with and without dysfunction or nulliparous vs. parous women are therefore of interest. Strength in whole-body exercises was not correlated to PFM strength, implying that targeted strength training of the PFM is necessary to improve PFM strength.
Concluding message
We found that heavy weightlifting, including squat and deadlift of 75-85% of 1RM, had no immediate effect on the PFM compared to rest in strength trained, nulliparous women. PFM strength was not correlated with either maximal strength or relative strength in squat and deadlift.
Figure 1 Figure 1: Example of pressure measurements of the pelvic floor muscles from one participant. MVC = Maximum voluntary contraction.
Figure 2 Table 1: Pelvic floor muscle measures: Pre and post heavy weightlifting and rest. N = 47. Data represented as mean difference, standard deviations (SD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) or median and interquartile range (IQR)
References
  1. Bo K, Nygaard IE. Is Physical Activity Good or Bad for the Female Pelvic Floor? A Narrative Review. Sports Med. 2020;50(3):471-84.
  2. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30. Epub 2004/07/01. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041. PubMed PMID: 15227649.
  3. Skaug KL, Engh ME, Frawley H, Bo K. Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Bother, and Risk Factors and Knowledge of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Norwegian Male and Female Powerlifters and Olympic Weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(10):2800-7.
Disclosures
Funding NONE Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Regional Ethics Committee (2018/2211/REK Sør-øst B, 20.12.2018) Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Citation

Continence 7S1 (2023) 100999
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2023.100999

17/04/2024 17:06:29