Hypothesis / aims of study
Endoscopic enucleation of prostate (EEP) is an appealing surgical procedure due to its excellent surgical outcome and long-term durability, making it an attractive option for urologists. However, the occurrence of post-operative stress or urge urinary incontinence (SUI/UUI), although temporary, can deter both urologists from performing EEP and patients from seeking treatment.
There are several risk factors identified for post-operative incontinence, such as resection ratio, PSA reduction rate, patient age, diabetes, or surgeon's experience. However, no definitive risk factor has been identified, making it more confusing for patients. In response, pioneering enucleation surgeons have modified their surgical technique to improve post-operative SUI/UUI. Endo et al. proposed the "Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP," which involves early apical release of the sphincter, greatly reducing the incidence of post-operative SUI/UUI. Several modified surgical techniques based on this early apical release method have been developed, with similar long-term outcomes in IPSS and quality of life.
The anterior fibromuscular stroma (AFS) contracts to open the bladder neck and initiate the voiding process [1]. AFS injury during prostate enucleation/TURP may disrupt the synchronization between the external sphincter, AFS, and detrusor, leading to incontinence or dysfunctional voiding. To investigate the continent status of our published AFS-preserved prostate enucleation [2] patients, we evaluated their voiding volume (VV) on the first day of Foley removal and at a 2-week follow-up after discharge from the hospital.
Study design, materials and methods
The patients included in our study underwent prostate enucleation by a single experienced surgeon. Those who received traditional en-bloc one lobe enucleation were recruited between July 2017 and December of the same year, while those who received AFS-preserved prostate enucleation were recruited between July 2019 and December of that year. Patients' baseline demographics, including PSA, TRUS, residual urine, and uroflow study, were collected. The Foley catheter was removed on the second postoperative day morning, and patients were discharged if they exhibited smooth voiding with low residual urine. The largest voiding volume noted before discharge was recorded. Two weeks later, a regular postoperative OPD follow-up was conducted, during which we collected the largest voiding volume recorded by the patients at home during this period.
Results
We enrolled a total of 177 patients who underwent prostate enucleation: 94 patients received AFS-preserved enucleation, while 83 patients underwent traditional enucleation. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age, BMI, DM, HTN, old CVA, parkinsonism, PSA, TRUS, and T zone. However, the AFS-preserved enucleation group had a higher percentage of patients taking anticoagulants compared to the traditional enucleation group (25.5% vs 7.3%, p=0.003). The AFS-preserved group had a significantly larger maximal VV on the first day after Foley removal than the traditional enucleation group (269cc vs 202cc, p=0.001), and this pattern continued with a larger maximal VV two weeks after discharge (356cc vs 270cc, p=0.001). Both groups had an increase in maximal VV two weeks after Foley removal, with the AFS-preserved enucleation group having a larger increase (263cc vs 356cc, p=0.0018) than the traditional enucleation group (202cc vs 271cc, p=0.0001).
Interpretation of results
Enucleation surgeons and patients are greatly concerned about the risk of urge/stress urinary incontinence following the procedure. Endo et al.'s proposal of "Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP" has significantly improved long-term urinary incontinence. Enucleation surgeons are now seeking appropriate tools to assess immediate incontinence after the procedure [3]. Urge/stress incontinence may lead to lower voiding volume, and patients may be apprehensive about urine leakage. Our AFS preserved enucleation technique [2] was compared to previous traditional enucleation methods using voiding volume, which showed a significant improvement following our surgical modification.