An integrative literature review investigated the mechanical and neural aspects of pelvic floor muscle contraction and various instruments for measuring this contraction. This review identified several key parameters related to pelvic floor muscle function, including location, thickness, muscle torque, pressure, and velocity. These parameters provided essential physiological characteristics of the pelvic floor muscles and supported the development of a device for simulating pelvic floor muscle function across four levels, as outlined by Brink et al (1989)[1] (Table 1). This measure uses concepts of pressure (rated 1 to 4), time and displacement. These parameters are assessed using the index and middle fingers positioned in the antero-posterior orientation, with the index finger resting atop the middle finger, inserted 4 cm to 6 cm into the vaginal canal.
The device uses an Arduino board as a central processing unit. The Arduino board has input and output data control circuits, allowing it to interface with various components (servo motors to mimic muscles) and resistive sensors (adjust actuators force). An Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that supports C/C++ programming language provides an interface for writing, compiling, and uploading code to the Arduino. Thus, it enables the Arduino to control each actuator individually as an individual pelvic muscle according to the predefined information raised in the review of the pelvic floor muscles physiology.
The servo motor (MG946R, 5VDC, 19mm x 40.7mm x 42.9mm, 55 grams) to simulate the contraction of pelvic floor muscles has metal gears to ensure greater torque, ranging between 10.5 Kg/cm and 13 Kg/cm, and has an operating speed ranging from 0.20 seconds per 60 degrees to 0.17 seconds per 60 degrees. Each servo motor pulls silicone-coated nylon bands to shorten the length (contraction). These bands are designed with a similar width and length to the pelvic floor muscles and are fixed according to their origin and insertion. The coordination of servo motors, including strength, speed, time, and location, is based on physiological parameters extracted from the integrative literature review.
A 3D-printed pelvic bone supports the artificial muscles and the vaginal canal made of silicone rubber. This setup allows for bidigital palpation of the pelvic floor muscles and their contraction. The synthetic pelvis provides a realistic texture and feel, enabling students to practice palpation techniques and assess muscle function effectively (Arduino based contraction simulation).
As part of the proof of concept, the device's ability to simulate pelvic floor muscle contraction and pressure will be compared with a commercial quantitative assessment method known as a perineometer. The comparison will be based on the Brink et al (1989) scale1, which provides a standardized framework for evaluating pelvic floor muscle function across four levels.
The activation patterns of the servo motors, which simulate pelvic floor muscle contraction, will play a crucial role in the configurations for student training and evaluation. These patterns will be programmed into the device to replicate various scenarios of pelvic floor muscle function, allowing students to practice assessment techniques.