IS ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS NECESSARY FOR INTRAVESICAL INJECTION OF BOTULINUM TOXIN IN WOMEN WITH DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY?

Lee J1, Umali A1, Blanchard M1, Rahmanou P1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Overactive Bladder

Abstract 545
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 105
Thursday 24th October 2024
13:10 - 13:15 (ePoster Station 1)
Exhibition Hall
Overactive Bladder Female Retrospective Study
1. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
There are no guidelines regarding the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for intravesical Botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) treatment for women with detrusor overactivity, and studies investigating their role demonstrate conflicting or inconclusive results. 
The reported rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) following BoNt-A varies widely from 10-44% and the majority of these studies involve procedures with antibiotic prophylaxis.
Our aim was to investigate the rate of UTI following intravesical BoNT-A without antibiotic prophylaxis, and the correlation between preceding and post-treatment UTI. We hypothesised that the rate of post-procedure UTI without antibiotic prophylaxis would be no greater than the reported risk in other studies.
Study design, materials and methods
Retrospective cohort study of women undergoing outpatient intravesical BoNT-A for detrusor overactivity in a district general hospital between 2020 and 2023, identifying 107 treatment episodes. Patients were screened pre-procedure to exclude UTI via urine culture and the majority (86%) treated with 100 units BoNT-A. Patients were followed up by telephone consultation at 6 weeks post-treatment. Data was collected from electronic and paper medical records.
Results
All women had overactive bladder symptoms with 96% women confirmed detrusor overactivity on urodynamics. 71% (60/84) were post-menopausal and 88% (74/84) parous. 
The overall risk of UTI was 7.5% (8/107) at 6 weeks and 23% (23/107) at 6 months, as denoted by a positive urine culture in symptomatic patients. 
The risk of UTI within 6 weeks of BoNT-A treatment was significantly lower in patients with no preceding UTI history (12 months prior to treatment) compared to patients who did have a previous history of UTI; 2.5% (2/79) and 21% (6/28) respectively (relative risk 8.4; 95% CI 1.81 - 39.5; p=0.006). 
The risk of UTI within 6 months of BoNT-A treatment treatment was 18.9% (15/79) for patient with no preceding UTI history and 28.6% (8/28) for those with a previous UTI history, but this did not carry statistical significance (relative risk 1.5; 95% CI 0.71 - 3.16; p=0.28).
Interpretation of results
The majority of women that developed UTI following intravesical BoNT-A treatment did so more than 6 weeks after administration, therefore the role of prophylactic antibiotics is limited. Intravesical BoNT-A treatment without antibiotic prophylaxis did not lead to a greater risk of developing UTI. Women who had a previous history of UTI were more likely to have post-BoNT-A UTI in the first 6 weeks following treatment.
Concluding message
Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary for intravesical BoNT-A treatment in patients who have been screened for infection by urine culture pre-procedure. 
Previous UTI is a risk factor for developing post-BoNT-A UTI.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd retrospective study not requiring ethics approval Helsinki not Req'd not a clinical trial Informed Consent No
01/05/2025 20:34:38