Lower urinary tract function after modified radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

Kimura Y1, Shimizu R1, Yamaguchi N1, Morizane S1, Hikita K1, Honda M1, Takenaka A1, Sawada M2, Komatsu H2, Taniguchi F2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract 599
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 105
Thursday 24th October 2024
14:15 - 14:20 (ePoster Station 3)
Exhibition Hall
Female Surgery Urodynamics Techniques
1. Department of Urology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Neurogenic bladder can develop after modified radical hysterectomy (mRH) and radical hysterectomy (RH) for endometrial and cervical cancer. The incidence of neurogenic bladder following RH has been reported to be 16%–80%1); however, there are variations in their evaluation methods. There are very few reports of systematic urodynamic studies (UDS), and the incidence of neurogenic bladder, particularly hypoactive bladder, remains unknown. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) is a procedure in which the uterine branch of the pelvic plexus is cut, and the bladder branch is preserved. NSRH is in shorter duration of surgery and less blood loss as well as in a clear improvement in the postoperative urinary status2). In this study, UDS and questionnaires were used to investigate lower urinary tract function following mRH and NSRH for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Study design, materials and methods
Of 21 patients who had undergone an mRH or RH for endometrial or cervical cancer between April 2022 and December 2023 at our hospital, 19 were included in this study. Preoperative and postoperative UDS (cystometrography and pressure-flow study) were performed. Also, the patients were evaluated based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) questionnaires preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients who had undergone mRH and RH were evaluated with respect to various UDS parameters (FDV, NDV, MCC, VV, Qmax, PdetQmax, DO, DSD, and RV) as well as the IPSS (total score and QOL score) and OABSS, with and without postoperative urapidil medication and also with and without clean intermittent catherterization (CIC) at discharge. The ethical review board of our hospital approved the study.
Results
The median ages of 7 patients in the mRH group and 12 patients in the RH group were 69.0 (45–79) and 48.5 (35–69) years, respectively, and the median durations for the removal of urinary catheters were 2.0 (2–3) and 5.0 (4–5) days in the mRH and RH groups, respectively. There were 0 patients in the mRH group and 7 patients in the NSRH group who used urapidil, a significant difference (p=0.016). CIC was required of 0 patients in the mRH group and 2 patients in the NSRH group, with no significant difference (p=0.386). The RH group had significantly higher IPSS total score and QOL score at 1 month postoperatively than the preoperative values, which reverted to the preoperative values at 6 months postoperatively. The mRH group had higher OABSS values than the RH group, but the differences were not significant. Postoperative UDS varied significantly with respect to MCV (mRH vs. RH, 257.4 ml vs. 354.4 ml, p = 0.034) and RV (21 ml vs. 115.8 ml, p = 0.021). However, both groups did not demonstrate significant differences for the other UDS parameters, including Qmax (18.1ml/s vs 13.9ml/s, p=0.80) and PdetQmax (21.7mmH2O vs 20.6mmH2O, p=0.887).
Interpretation of results
The present results showed significant differences between mRH and NSRH in urapidil medication, postoperative RV, and MCC. IPSS showed that bladder dysfunction worsened only in NSRH at 1 month postoperatively, and then improved.
Concluding message
Although there were more cases of increased residual urine and more cases requiring urapidil medication in NSRH than in mRH, there was no difference in CIC, Qmax, or PdetQmax, suggesting that nerve preservation suppressed lower urinary tract dysfunction due to nerve damage.
References
  1. Bosch JLH, Norton P, Jones JS : Should we screen for and treat lower urinary tract dysfunction after major pelvic surgery?. Neurourol Urodyn 31 : 327-329, 2012
  2. Hiroaki K, Masayo O, Kohei Hikino. et. al.: A simplified procedure of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 48: 766-773.2022
Disclosures
Funding non Clinical Trial Yes Registration Number Tottori University Hospital, 21B014 RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Tottori University Hospital Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
28/06/2025 07:41:33