Current status of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) education in South Korea

Shin J1, Kim C1, Jeon S1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences

Abstract 750
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 108
Friday 25th October 2024
13:55 - 14:00 (ePoster Station 2)
Exhibition Hall
Questionnaire Incontinence Nursing
1. Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hostpital
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
It is well-known that individualized, step-wise, and centralized intensive education is important for patients’ better understanding and compliance to clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). However, education circumstances and available infrastructure including place, time, competence of educator and education materials might vary. We investigated the current status of CIC education among various hospitals in South Korea.
Study design, materials and methods
On-line survey via Google® form was performed in March 2023. URL-link was distributed three times through e-mail (once) and text message (twice) to clinical practitioners who perform urodynamic study in each hospital. The subjects to survey were those who were listed up in the address book of Korean Continence Society and their workplace was either secondary or tertiary hospitals. Following parameters were inquired - characteristics of CIC educator and education target, education circumstances including place and materials, types of initially recommended catheters, and education loading; number of cases per month, mean required time for each case, and main problems in current education settings.
Results
The survey was delivered to a total of 93 clinical practitioners who worked in 60 different hospitals. The overall response rate was 33%. CIC education was mainly performed by clinical practitioners who are in charge of urodynamic study, followed by physician assistant (PA) of the urology department. For outpatients, more than half of CIC education was performed in urodynamic study room. For inpatients, the proportion of CIC education place was half ward and half outpatient clinic. In both cases, private space solely designated for CIC education was available in less than 3%. Education materials provided by catheter company were most widely used (50%) followed by self-produced materials from each hospital or urology department (30%). There were no public or formal CIC education materials created by urological associations. Initially recommended catheter was single-use catheter (nearly 90%) from various company; however, catheter selection was limited by national health insurance coverage in 14% of cases. Finally, mean consumed time for single session CIC education was 11 to 30 minutes in 60%, 31 to 60 minutes in 20%, and 5 to 10 minutes in 16.7%. The number of CIC education cases depended on hospital volume, but about 70% performed within 10 cases per month. Most respondents complained about limitations in available time and place to provide detailed education for patients’ sufficient understanding on CIC.
Interpretation of results
Most urodynamic studies in urology department are performed by nurse practitioners in South Korea that our survey subjects were all nurses. Specialized personnel who solely take charge of CIC education were absent that unpredictable occurrence of CIC education increased the work load among clinical practitioners. In addition, absence of private place for CIC education result in frequent utilization of vacancies in outpatient clinic. Such variabilities in educator and education place hamper stable and full-time CIC education. Single-session CIC education usually took about median of 20 minutes which was too short for explaining the need, methodology, cautions, and key takeaways about CIC and achieving high-level of patients’ understanding. The number of monthly CIC cases might seem not too much, but considering that there is no education fee for CIC in South Korea, current CIC education fails in successful patients’ understanding and only places a physical burden on the educator. Moreover, limited national insurance coverage of single-use catheter (about 6.7 US dollar per day) restricts patients’ selection on types of catheters especially if they require more than four times of CIC per day.
Concluding message
Currently, there were limited human resources, places, and education materials for high-quality CIC education in South Korea. Clinical practitioners mainly complained about limitations in available time and place to provide adequate and satisfactory education for patients.  However, hospitals are reluctant to pay attention to hiring additional personnel or creating room for descent CIC education as it does not make any income to the organization. In addition, limited amount of national insurance coverage on single-use catheter hinders free selection of adequate catheters and act as economic burden for those who require more than four catheters per day.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects None
12/05/2025 12:27:30