RETROPUBIC TVT URETHRAL SLING EXTRUSION REMOVAL VIA SUPRAURETHRAL APPROACH WITH CONCOMITANT URETHROPLASTY

PENAFIEL J1, HAUDEBERT C1, RICHARD C1, HASCOET J1, PEYRONNET B1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urethra Male / Female

Abstract 852
Non Discussion Video
Scientific Non Discussion Video Session 200
Stress Urinary Incontinence Voiding Dysfunction Female Genital Reconstruction Grafts: Synthetic
1. Rennes University Hospital
Links

Abstract

Introduction
This case study addresses a female patient with a history of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treated with a retropubic transvaginal tape (RP-TVT) in 2018. Approximately one year prior to the current evaluation, the patient experienced a recurrence of daytime urinary incontinence to coughing, laughing, or sneezing, alongside urgency and leakage during standing or walking. Additionally, the patient reported frequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) with typical symptoms and positive urine cultures.
Design
The patient underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including symptomatology assessment, urinalysis, cystourethroscopy, and translabial ultrasound. The diagnostic workup aimed to elucidate the cause of urinary complaints and assess the condition of the previously placed TVT. A significant mid-urethral extrusion of the RP-TVT was confirmed, resulting in urethral extrusion and severe consequent obstruction.
Results
Translabial ultrasound and cystourethroscopy confirmed mid-urethral extrusion of the RP-TVT, contributing to severe urethral obstruction. Uroflowmetry indicated a significantly reduced maximum flow rate (Qmax=4 ml/s). The patient's symptomatology, alongside diagnostic findings, led to a decision for surgical intervention involving vaginal suprameatal removal of the extruded RP-TVT with concomitant urethroplasty. The patient was discharged on the same day of the intervention.
Conclusion
The recurrence of urinary incontinence, alongside UTIs and diagnostic findings of RP-TVT urethral extrusion and stenosis, required the removal of the prosthetic sling and subsequent urethral reconstruction. This case highlights the complexity of managing complications associated with prosthetic sling procedures for SUI, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment plans and consideration of complex surgical repair that may require an alternative surgical approach. The patient was advised of the potential recurrent stress urinary incontinence, which could necessitate further urinary anti-incontinence interventions.
Disclosures
Funding NONE Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd Surgical case, approved by patient's consent Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
27/06/2025 09:33:13