Intravesical cocktail instillation: A Viable Adjunct to first line therapy for Bladder pain syndrome

Papalkar N1, Koduri A2, Narigapalli B2, Veluguleti S2, Parivallal U2, Gurrala S2, Sunakavalli S3, Natarajan R3, Parganiha A2, Vandanasetti R2, Desai N2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Pelvic Pain Syndromes

Abstract 115
Urology 4 - Bladder Pain and Infections
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 10
Thursday 18th September 2025
16:45 - 16:52
Parallel Hall 2
Painful Bladder Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis (IC) Pain, other Retrospective Study
1. KIMS Hospitals, Secunderabad, India, 2. KIMS Hospitals, Secunderabad, 3. KIMS Hospitals Secunderabad
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
1.To compare the clinical response and effectiveness of two modalities of treatment in female patients of Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) in a single tertiary care centre

2. To postulate a more efficient modality as an adjunct to the first line therapy in women with Bladder Pain syndrome
Study design, materials and methods
Retrospective study

n=132 women age 25 to 80 years , clinically diagnosed as Bladder pain syndrome (bladder-centric)

Duration: 6 years and 3 months (June 2018 to September 2024), followed up till March 2025.

The participants were asked to record 3-day voiding diaries and scored for 

1)O’Leary-Sant symptom and pain indices (ICSI and ICPI), 
2)Pelvic pain Urgency and Frequency (symptom+bother score), 
3)FGUPI, 
4)BPIC-SS 

After discussion of treatment options, by informed choice and consent, 
52 patients (Group 1) chose to have behavioural modification + Amitriptyline +/- oral Pentosan polysulfate and 
80 patients (Group 2) took weekly intravesical cocktail instillation, consisting of
Heparin 10000U, 25ml Bupivacaine 0.25%, Inj Triamcinolone 40mg and 50-100 ml of Inj Sodium bicarbonate 7.5%, 
instilled aseptically through a transurethral catheter and left in situ for 30-60 minutes (dwell time) for 4-8weeks.

After completion of either modality of treatment, all the scores were repeated to evaluate and compare the outcome
All patients were followed up for 8-24 weeks. 
Statistical analysis was done using two-sample t-test.

5) GRA (Global response assessment) was done at the end of the follow up period, on a Likert scale of 1-5

Adverse effects of the medicines, episodes of cystitis and disease flares, if any, were noted.
Results
There was improvement in the ICSI, ICPI, PPUF, FGUPI, BPIC-SS and GRA scores in both the groups
 
A comparative analysis between Group 2 (intravesical cocktail instillation) and Group 1 (Behavioural+/- Pharmacotherapy) demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all evaluated outcome measures.

Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI): t = 4.09, p = 0.000
Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI): t = 4.33, p = 0.000
Bladder Pain Syndrome Score (BPSS): t = 5.31, p = 0.000
Symptom Score: t = 3.76, p = 0.00026
Female Genitourinary Score (FGU): t = 3.11, p = 0.0023
Global Response Assessment (GRA): t = 2.38, p = 0.0186


All p-values were statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating superior outcomes in the Group 2

The improvement was faster in Group 2 as compared to Group 1 (statistically significant)

The side effects were more acceptable in Group 2 than in Group 1

No episode of cystitis or flares were noted in the follow up period in Group 2
Interpretation of results
Patients receiving intravesical cocktail instillation as an adjunct to first-line therapy experienced significant symptomatic relief and overall improvement in quality of life compared to those receiving first-line therapy alone or with pharmacotherapy (TCA+/-Pentosan polysulfate).

The recovery period in patients receiving Cocktail therapy was significantly shorter than in the comparative group.

The consistent statistical significance across all symptom indices and patient-reported outcomes and the faster recovery - reinforce the efficacy of the Intravesical cocktail instillation approach in managing bladder pain syndrome.

These findings align with AUA guidelines supporting Intravesical therapy as a second line therapy [1]
and previous studies highlighting the efficacy of Intravesical agents in symptom relief [2]
Concluding message
Intravesical cocktail instillation is a promising and viable adjunct to standard first-line treatment for Bladder Pain Syndrome, with early improvement and fewer adverse effects. .

It offers enhanced symptom relief, improved patient-reported outcomes, and represents a valuable addition to the therapeutic arsenal for managing this chronic and often debilitating condition. 

Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols.
Figure 1 Recovery duration
Figure 2 Difference in scores - significant
References
  1. Hanno PM, Erickson D, Moldwin R, Faraday MM. Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: AUA guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1545-53. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.086
  2. van Ophoven A, Hertle L. Intravesical therapy of painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a review. ScientificWorldJournal. 2004;4(S1):S632–S644. doi:10.1100/tsw.2004.146
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee KIMS Ethics Committee Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
13/07/2025 06:13:53