5-year outcomes of robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation in female patients with stress urinary incontinence

DUBOIS A1, RICHARD C1, LETHUILLIER V1, HAUDBEERT C1, VOIRY C1, FRETON L1, BENSALAH K1, MANUNTA A1, HASCOET J1, PEYRONNET B1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Abstract 18
Urogynaecology 1 - Female Stress Incontinence
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 2
Thursday 18th September 2025
09:37 - 09:45
Parallel Hall 3
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Retrospective Study
1. University hospital of Rennes
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
In recent years, several preliminary reports have suggested that the robotic approach may decrease the surgical morbidity of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, only short-term outcomes were reported. The aim of the present study was to report the 5-year outcomes of robot-assisted AUS implantation in women.
Study design, materials and methods
All female patients who underwent a robot-assisted AUS implantation between February 2014 and October 2018 at a single academic center were included in a retrospective study. The indication for AUS implantation was SUI due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) in all cases, i.e. SUI demonstrated at the cough stress test with a fixed urethra, low maximum urethral closure pressure. Revision-free and explantation-free survivals were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyzes.
Results
31 patients underwent AUS implantation over the study period and were included. The median age was 70 years and 25 patients had a history of previous anti-incontinence procedure. There were 6 intraoperative complications : 3 bladder neck injury and 3 vaginal injury. 11 patients had post-operative complications, 1 Clavien ≥3.

7 patients did not reach the 5-year timepoint : 3 died and 4 were lost to follow-up. After a median follow-up of 62 months, 5 AUS explantations were needed : three for vaginal exposure of the cuff, one for urethral extrusion of a synthetic midurethral sling next to the cuff and one for labial exposure of the pump) and three revisions were required (9.7%): two for mechanical failure and one for inadequate pump positioning. The 5-year estimated explantation-free survival was 82.5% (figure 1) and the 5-year estimated revision-free survival was 88.7%. Among the 5 patients explanted, 3 were reimplanted, 1 underwent a fascial sling and 1 underwent an ileal conduit. Hence, 29 patients had an AUS in situ at the last follow-up visit (93.5%) but 3 of these were permanently deactivated.
Interpretation of results
At last follow-up, 18 patients reported being dry (58.1%), six were improved (19.4%) and seven were unchanged (22.6%) including the five who had their device explanted or deactivated.
Concluding message
The 5-year outcomes of robot-assisted AUS implantation seems to confirm the promising short-term outcomes that have been reported so far, although revision and explantation rates increased with time as expected.
Figure 1 Explantation free survival
Figure 2 Revision free survival
Figure 3 Population's characteristics
Disclosures
Funding No funding Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee CNIL
04/07/2025 02:33:46